Today's hottest tech items are listening devices such as "Google Home" and "Amazon Echo". These are WiFi/Internet connected and can respond to voice commands and answer them with built in speakers. For example, if you wanted to know who wrote the Wizard of Oz, and you have an active Google Home device, you would simple say "OK Google" followed by the command "who wrote the "The Wizard of Oz"? Then it would search the Internet and respond with the answer.
Here's the problem. These devices respond to anyone's voice. A fact that resulted in two major problems this year.
The first was during the airing of the Super Bowl. Google Home ran a 60 second commercial, and the words "OK Google" were repeated over and over again. As result, any Google Home devices that were within earshot of the commercial literally went nuts trying to comply with multiple commands in such a short period of time.
The second disaster was caused by Burger King, who apparently saw this TV to Google Home relationship as positive. In a 15 second TV Commercial, the spokesperson leans into the camera and says "OK Google, What is the Whopper burger". Immediately every Google Home device within earshot responded by listing the ingredients of the Whopper from Wikipedia. Here's the commercial and Google Home's response:
I don't know how many Google Home devices were affected by this, but it demonstrates a real problem. If you have WiFi connected devices/appliances in your home that are compatible with Google Home commands, they can be controlled by anyone's voice. Those items could include your security system or your garage door opener.
Now, think about that. If someone knows you have Google Home and knows that you have an answering machine within earshot of it, that person could potentially open your garage door or shutdown your security system by simply calling your home. And, what if your Google Home is hacked and your every conversation is being recorded by an external listener? After all, Google Home is connected to your network. A simple phishing attachment to an email that you opened could tell a hacker all the devices that are connected to your WiFi including Google Home, your refrigerator, your security system, or garage door opener. Google Home is also capable of remotely starting your car or opening its doors; if so connected.
Obviously people should reconsider the convenience of Google Home and the devices that they hook into it.
References:
Google's Home TV ad makes Google Home systems go crazy: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/06/googles-home-tv-ad-makes-google-home-systems-go-crazy.html
Alexa and Google Home Record What You Say. But What Happens to That Data?: https://www.wired.com/2016/12/alexa-and-google-record-your-voice/
Why your next Echo command should be: ‘Disconnect me from the internet’: http://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article148879664.html
Google Says No Whopper For YOU! Shuts Down Burger King’s Google Home Hack: http://hothardware.com/news/google-shuts-down-burger-kings-google-home-hack
Keeping Your Home Safe With Google Home: https://homealarmreport.com/keeping-home-safe-google-home/
How to keep your smart TV from spying on you | ZDNet: http://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-keep-your-smart-tv-from-spying-on-you/
Showing posts with label Burger King. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Burger King. Show all posts
Friday, May 26, 2017
Monday, October 6, 2014
Does Obama Think Warren Buffett Is Unpatriotic?
Pictured above, liberal billionaire Warren Buffett is apparently a well respected person to whom the President is clearly intent on listening to. In fact, in 2011, Barack Obama couldn't speak of Warren Buffet enough while promoting increased taxes on millionaires because, in the past, Buffett has actively criticized our tax system for letting the rich pay a smaller share of their income than those in the middle class. By what he calls the Buffett Rule, the President's 2011 tax plan would increase the top income tax rate to 30%. Unfortunately, for Obama, the Buffett Rule was never passed into law because there were never enough Senate votes to enact it.
But, that was then and, now, Buffett, may just be on the President's sh*t list.
That's because, Burger King -- a company that Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate has a $3 billion stake in, and for which he would receive a handsome annual 9% interest payment -- is now using Buffet's money to move its headquarters to Canada to avoid paying high taxes in the U.S.. This is done by using a process called corporate inversion or tax inversion. Just this year, Obama has called such actions "unpatriotic".
So, with that, is Warren Buffett -- who is vehemently defending the Burger King's tax inversion deal because, of course, he is a rich guy who will only get richer because Burger King can duck U.S. taxes -- now "unpatriotic" by Obama's very public definition?
Of course, one thing is sure. Buffett's backing of tax inversion has put the President in a box where he can never again refer to the Buffett Rule when trying to push higher taxes on the rich. Nor, can Obama ever criticize corporate tax inversions. Because to do so would force him to criticized Buffett; a major and very influential donor to liberal causes and liberal politics.
References:
Picture Source: 2011: Obama Meets With Warren Buffett: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/07/picture-of-the-day-obama-meets-with-warren-buffett/242161/
Buffet Rule: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffett_Rule
Obama: Offshore 'Tax Inversions' Are Unpatriotic: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/26/obama-tax-inversions_n_5623222.html
Warren Buffett stands by Burger King deal: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/warren-buffett-burger-king-111092.html
Why Burger King Is Paying 9% for Warren Buffett’s Blessing: http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/09/03/why-burger-king-is-paying-9-for-warren-buffetts-blessing/
But, that was then and, now, Buffett, may just be on the President's sh*t list.
That's because, Burger King -- a company that Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate has a $3 billion stake in, and for which he would receive a handsome annual 9% interest payment -- is now using Buffet's money to move its headquarters to Canada to avoid paying high taxes in the U.S.. This is done by using a process called corporate inversion or tax inversion. Just this year, Obama has called such actions "unpatriotic".
So, with that, is Warren Buffett -- who is vehemently defending the Burger King's tax inversion deal because, of course, he is a rich guy who will only get richer because Burger King can duck U.S. taxes -- now "unpatriotic" by Obama's very public definition?
Of course, one thing is sure. Buffett's backing of tax inversion has put the President in a box where he can never again refer to the Buffett Rule when trying to push higher taxes on the rich. Nor, can Obama ever criticize corporate tax inversions. Because to do so would force him to criticized Buffett; a major and very influential donor to liberal causes and liberal politics.
References:
Picture Source: 2011: Obama Meets With Warren Buffett: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/07/picture-of-the-day-obama-meets-with-warren-buffett/242161/
Buffet Rule: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffett_Rule
Obama: Offshore 'Tax Inversions' Are Unpatriotic: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/26/obama-tax-inversions_n_5623222.html
Warren Buffett stands by Burger King deal: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/warren-buffett-burger-king-111092.html
Why Burger King Is Paying 9% for Warren Buffett’s Blessing: http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/09/03/why-burger-king-is-paying-9-for-warren-buffetts-blessing/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)