Just hours after Dylann Roof killed 9 innocents at the Emanuel AME Church, both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama blamed the deaths on the lack of tighter gun controls. Now, we find out that Dylann Roof -- under current gun laws -- should never have been allowed to buy the gun in the first place. Because of human error in the FBI's background check process, Roof's prior felony drug conviction was not flagged and therefore there was nothing stopping him from purchasing the firearm.
In the case of the recent killing of a San Francisco woman by an illegal alien that had been deported 5 times, and who had committed several crimes, the FBI should have arrested him months ago when they were notified that the SF police had him in custody. So, as a result of that error we have another murder that could have been avoided.
These kind of FBI failures are not uncommon. One of the shooters at the Draw Mohammed Contest in Garland Texas had been on the FBI's radar for years. Yet, where were they when, days before, this guy was talking up his plans under the clear-as-day hashtag #texasattack?
Before the Boston Marathon bombing, the older Tsarnaev brother also surfaced on FBI radar and was even interviewed by them. Some even think he was recruited as an informant. Yet, he went on to kill and maim.
Then there was the Fort Hood shooting. Nadal Hasan was also interviewed by the FBI when he came to their attention after having been in e-mail correspondence with radical jihadist cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. Yet, he was able to later kill without intervention.
The President says he's tired of all the mass killings in this country. Well, tired as he may be, perhaps he and his Justice Department should try and ride herd over his own FBI before he calls for all kinds of new gun laws.
References:
Dylann Roof should NOT have been allowed to purchase a gun and was able to because background check system FAILED: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3156588/FBI-Church-gunman-shouldnt-able-gun.html
San Francisco sheriff says feds to blame in immigrant shooting case: http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/10/us/san-francisco-killing/
Texas Jihad Attack Exposes FBI Failure: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/05/texas-jihad-attack-exposes-fbi-failure/
Internal Documents Reveal How the FBI Blew Fort Hood: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/08/nidal-hasan-anwar-awlaki-emails-fbi-fort-hood
FBI pushed elder Tsarnaev to be informer, lawyers assert: https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/03/28/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-attorneys-seek-government-evidence-tamerlan-say-may-help-defense/PJoDIO3Tdf3zIau7VM9m8L/story.html
Mourning Charleston, Obama calls for stricter gun laws: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/06/18/obama-charleston-statement/28919199/
Clinton, Obama seek gun control in wake of Charleston: http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/18/politics/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-charleston-gun-reform/
Showing posts with label Garland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Garland. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
Friday, May 8, 2015
Why the "Draw Muhammad" Event May Not Be Protected Freedom Of Speech
When the "Draw Muhammad" event in Garland, Texas resulted in an attack by two would-be terrorists, its organizer, Pam Gellar, claimed that her right to hold the contest was protected by the first amendment. Ever since, talk show hosts and TV legal analysts have been hotly debating the issue. Those who believe she had that legal right often cite the Supreme Court's decision in favor of the Westboro Baptist Church, which allowed them to continue to spew hate speech against Jews, gays, and others, and to picket funerals of anyone that offends them or their brand of religion.
However, we need to understand that constitutionally protected speech is not all encompassing. Anytime speech can cause harm to people and/or property, it is no longer protected. Citing a classic example, you can't yell fire in a crowd theater because the resulting stampede could cause bodily harm. Sedition, or the written or verbal advocacy of a revolt or the overthrow of any authority or government, is punishable under federal law. Calling in a bomb threat, even if false, is a felony punishable by fines and imprisonment. Defamation (libel or slander) is also legally subject to civil lawsuits in all 50 states.
In my opinion, the law that applies to Pam Gellar and her organized event and which overrides her right to freedom of speech is "Inciting a Riot". Here is the definition from the website USLegal.com:
Pam Gellar knew full well that she would most likely incite violence, otherwise, she wouldn't have contracted such heavy security. All those people at "Draw Muhammad" are fortunate that there weren't more shooters and more deaths that day.
References:
Watch: FNC's MacCallum, Pamela Geller Battle over Freedom Of Speech: http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/05/05/watch-fncs-maccallum-pamela-geller-battle-over-free-speech/
Shouting fire in a crowded theater: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_theater
Westboro Baptist Church: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church
Inciting a Riot Law and Legal Definition: http://definitions.uslegal.com/i/incite-a-riot/
Bomb Threat: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomb_threat
Sedition: Legal Definition: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sedition
Defamation Law Made Simple: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/defamation-law-made-simple-29718.html
Boosted Security Prevent Higher Body Counts at Garland Shooting: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/05/04/boosted-security-prevents-higher-body-count-at-draw-muhammad-shooting.html
However, we need to understand that constitutionally protected speech is not all encompassing. Anytime speech can cause harm to people and/or property, it is no longer protected. Citing a classic example, you can't yell fire in a crowd theater because the resulting stampede could cause bodily harm. Sedition, or the written or verbal advocacy of a revolt or the overthrow of any authority or government, is punishable under federal law. Calling in a bomb threat, even if false, is a felony punishable by fines and imprisonment. Defamation (libel or slander) is also legally subject to civil lawsuits in all 50 states.
In my opinion, the law that applies to Pam Gellar and her organized event and which overrides her right to freedom of speech is "Inciting a Riot". Here is the definition from the website USLegal.com:
Under federal law, a riot is a public disturbance involving an act of violence by one or more persons assembled in a group of at least three people. Inciting a riot applies to a person who organizes, encourages, or participates in a riot. It can apply to one who urges or instigates others to riot. According to 18 USCS § 2102 "to incite a riot", or "to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot", includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.”Technically, the two shooters were not part of the assembled group at the event, but the courts might rule otherwise because their intent was to join the group with the intent to commit murder and violence.
Pam Gellar knew full well that she would most likely incite violence, otherwise, she wouldn't have contracted such heavy security. All those people at "Draw Muhammad" are fortunate that there weren't more shooters and more deaths that day.
References:
Watch: FNC's MacCallum, Pamela Geller Battle over Freedom Of Speech: http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/05/05/watch-fncs-maccallum-pamela-geller-battle-over-free-speech/
Shouting fire in a crowded theater: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_theater
Westboro Baptist Church: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church
Inciting a Riot Law and Legal Definition: http://definitions.uslegal.com/i/incite-a-riot/
Bomb Threat: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomb_threat
Sedition: Legal Definition: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sedition
Defamation Law Made Simple: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/defamation-law-made-simple-29718.html
Boosted Security Prevent Higher Body Counts at Garland Shooting: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/05/04/boosted-security-prevents-higher-body-count-at-draw-muhammad-shooting.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)