2016: The Hottest Year Ever by 1/100th of a Degree!

On January 18th, NASA and NOAA declared 2016, the hottest year ever.  Hotter even, than the record reached in 2015.  A fact based on weather records being kept since the 1890's.  This is music to the ears of those who support the belief that global warming is man-made.  Music because it only reinforces the fact that action must be taken immediately to control climate change.

In this chicken-little scenario,  most people don't realize that this "hottest" declaration is based on a 1/100th of a degree increase over 2015's record-setting average. That is well within the margin of error. Therefore, for those who don't understand what a statistical "margin of error" means, it could just as well be that 2016 was actually 1/100th of a degree cooler than 2015.  Additionally, these claims fly in the face of satellite data showing an 18 year pause in global warming.  However, that data appears to come from a separate department at NASA. Apparently, these scientists are not to be heard as they work out of a closet in the basement of the space agency's building.

Global warming alarmists want us to trust science.  But, when science is in conflict, people need to step back and see both possibilities.  The fact is, that satellites are not confirming the "hottest" year ever claim.  Of course, leave it to the left-leaning media to toss red meat out to all the climate change alarmists without a balanced perspective of the satellite data.

References:

How 2016 Became Earth’s Hottest Year on Record: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/18/science/earth/2016-hottest-year-on-record.html

Why NYT Hid The Numbers For The ‘Hottest Year On Record’: http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/18/nyt-hid-numbers-hottest-year-record/

Load of bollocks: 2016 allegedly ‘hottest year’ by immeasurable 1/100 of a degree – While satellites show ‘pause’ continues: http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/01/18/load-of-bollocks-2016-allegedly-hottest-year-by-immeasurable-1100-of-a-degree-while-satellites-show-pause-continues/

2015 Was Not Even Close To Hottest Year On Record: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2016/01/14/2015-was-not-even-close-to-hottest-year-on-record/#75a0c16723c6

Record Heat? Where Are the Records Being Broken?

By presenting the following map, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) claims that the first 6 months of this year continued the earth's record setting warming trend:

Of course, this follows a similar map that claims 2014 was the hottest year on record:

In both of these maps, the darker pink is where temperatures are much warmer than normal and the red is where record heat has occurred.  For the U.S., the only area on these two maps where there was record heat was on the West Coast.  Most consistently, in the cities on California's coast line.

Logically, it would follow that if records are being set, previous records would have to fall.  So, I went to the weather site Intellicast and found the current weather data for the following California cities: San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.  Once there, I clicked on the "Historical Averages" section which brought me to a webpage where you not only get average temperatures, rainfall, etc., you also can look at record highs for each day of the year and in what year that record was set.  Checking all 365 days of weather records for those three cities, not one record high temperature was broken in either 2014 or 2015.  In fact, many of the record highs for any given day go back decades.  For example, the hottest single-day record for the month of July was set in 1930.

Is this proof that global warming and NOAA (including NASA) are all frauds?  Perhaps the greatest scientific fraud ever perpetrated on mankind (see link below).

References:

The First Half of 2015 Was the Hottest Ever: http://time.com/3966587/2015-climate-change-heat/

NASA, NOAA Find 2014 Warmest Year in Modern Record: https://www.nasa.gov/press/2015/january/nasa-determines-2014-warmest-year-in-modern-record

Intellicast Historical Data for San Diego: http://www.intellicast.com/Local/History.aspx?location=USCA0982

Intellicast Historical Data for Los Angeles: http://www.intellicast.com/Local/History.aspx?location=USCA0638

Intellicast Historical Data for San Fransisco: http://www.intellicast.com/Local/History.aspx?location=USCA0987

The Greatest Scientific Fraud of All Time--Part VI:  http://manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2015/7/21/the-greatest-scientific-fraud-of-all-time-part-v

The State of the Union Address and 2014 'Hottest Year' Reports

Its a miracle!  A miracle that two separate agencies of the federal government could work independently on two separate reports and manage to release both on the very same day.  But, it happened.  Both NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) simultaneously released reports that proved that 2014 was the hottest year on earth on record.  Or, at least, the hottest in the last 130 years of record keeping.

The New York Times celebrated the event with this headline: "2014 Breaks Heat Record, Challenging Global Warming Skeptics."

Wow! This must be really something!  Well, it would be until you find out that this new hottest record was broken by only one one-hundredths of a degree.  The supposed previous record was 58.45 degrees.  The new record literally clobbered the old with a temperature of 58.46 degrees.  Of course, for political reasons, the liberal and pro-climate change initiatives, the New York Times wouldn't tell us that.  Instead, they simply reported that the record was broken.

But, there's a problem with data used in creating these reports.  Both reports are based on thousands of surface thermometer readings from all over the world.  Some are maintained and properly calibrated; and, some not. Sometimes they break and the replacement may read hotter than the old one. Many depend on a hopefully diligent human to accurately and manually record the data; every hour on the hour.  Then, that data must be again manually entered into a centralized computer database which is always subject to fat-fingered data entry errors. As the noted climatologist  Dr. Roy Spencer said in putting down the accuracy of the two reports:

'The thermometer network is made up of a patchwork of non-research quality instruments that were never made to monitor long-term temperature changes to tenths or hundredths of a degree, and the huge data voids around the world are either ignored or in-filled with fictitious data.'

These two reports also contradict the RSS or Remote Sensing System's satellite data which is certainly more accurate and which collects data automatically from places that no thermometer even exists.  Like the mountain tops, the seas, and the polar ice caps. According to Dr. Spencer, through the end of October, that data had 2014 ranked as the 7th warmest year since satellite monitoring had been initiated.  And, it is highly unlikely that the 7th warmest year standing would be upset with just 2 months more of data remaining outstanding.

It is also interesting that these two reports were released on a Friday; just 4 days ahead of Obama's State of the Union Address.  That gave it all weekend to be discussed on all the cable news stations and, on each of the Sunday news shows.  Then, the "hottest ever" is sure to be incorporated into Obama's address to the nation on Tuesday in support of his radical climate agenda.


Isn't it convenient that both NASA and NOAA report to Obama?

Update: After writing this blog entry, the UK Daily Mail reported that NASA only thinks that they are 38% right on 2014 being the hottest year.  In other words, their report might be 62% wrong.  A fact that NASA conveniently forgot to mention in their "hottest" press release.  Also a fact that the liberal media seems to be ignoring ahead of the President's State of the Union speech.

References:

NASA, NOAA Find 2014 Warmest Year in Modern Record: http://www.nasa.gov/press/2015/january/nasa-determines-2014-warmest-year-in-modern-record/

2014 Breaks Heat Record, Challenging Global Warming Skeptics: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/17/science/earth/2014-was-hottest-year-on-record-surpassing-2010.html

Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’: http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/10/21/climatologist-dr-roy-spencer-why-2014-wont-be-the-warmest-year-on-record-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree/

Dr. Roy Spencer Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer_%28scientist%29

No Record Temperatures According To Satellites: http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/12/03/no-record-temperatures-according-to-satellites/

Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’: http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/

Nasa climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record... but we're only 38% sure we were right: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915061/Nasa-climate-scientists-said-2014-warmest-year-record-38-sure-right.html

The Seriousness of the BP Oil Situation Was Known From the Onset!

In my May 1st blog, I pointed out the fact that anyone knowing anything about the oil business knows that an explosion and uncontrolled fire on any sea-based or land-based drilling operation spells trouble. Now we know from a video (Click to See Full Story: Video shows federal officials knew quickly of potential for massive oil flow in Gulf spill) that was shot at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency's (NOAA) Seattle headquarters that the Federal Government knew early on about the potential danger! Yet, Obama was so preoccupied with Earth Day and his Wall Street agenda that he failed to mobilize anyone until 8 days into the disaster. I would think that Obama is in trouble on this; just as Bush was with Katrina. But, so far, the fact that this video even exists is being completely ignored by the mainstream media; thus, protecting their guy, Barack.

As a point of reference, NOAA is an agency that reports up to Obama through his Secretary of Commerce and the Commerce Department. So, he has no ability to claim that it is an independent agency; as in the case of the Securities and Exchange Commission filing suit against Goldman-Sachs. So, this screw-up is directly on his back.

Climate Change: Getting Hotter and Hotter?

The above scrunched-down image is actually a table of the 20 hottest Junes out of the last 115 years of data available from the U.S. National Climatic Data Center (Click here for a Clearer Version).

If you will note, the hottest month of June, ever, was 1933; followed by 1918. The only 21st century Junes that made the top 20 list are 2002 (ranked 5th) and 2006 (ranked 6th). Nine of the top twenty hottest Junes are before 1936. 17 out of the 20 hottest Junes occur before 1990.

Now, I might be wrong but, if global warming is a result of increased carbon dioxide in our atmosphere and CO2 levels have been consistently rising every year for the last 115 years (according to the global warmists), shouldn't the top twenty hottest Junes be more heavily populated by dates later than 1989 (the last 20 years of June data)? Yet, there are only 4 years later than that date that appear on the top 20 list. That hardly shows a growing trend in rising temperatures due to global warming!

If you would like to replicate this listing or create lists for other month's of data over the last 115 years, you can do so by going to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html. Then simply select the month of the year you wish to analyze. Be sure to select "Table" and "Rank" before you hit the "Submit" button.

Note: The table as shown in this blog entry has been edited to a shortened length for reference purposes only.