One thing I've realized while doing research for this blog is that gun control activists lie because they can't win on facts.
In fact, Katie Couric just followed that tradition by lying in a documentary she recently aired called "Under the Gun". In a round table discussion with a panel of gun rights advocates, Couric asked "If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?". In the aired version, that question is followed by 9 seconds of silence with edited-in video clips of the panel looking perplexed or, as some say, stupid. However, the real version -- that was edited out -- showed thoughtful responses to the question by the panel members. But, like most gun control activists, they don't want "thoughtful" or realistic anything regarding gun control.
Take the gun show loophole that Hillary Clinton decries constantly. There is none. What she calls the gun show loophole is the fact that any private citizen, per the Brady Bill, can transfer the possession of a firearm to another private party without a background check. That was an intentional part of the law and not a loophole. She also claims that 40% of guns sold at gun shows and on the internet are sold without background checks. There isn't a single study or report that supports that claim. That statistic is a perversion of a 1994 telephone survey that asked the respondents if they bought their gun from a licensed dealer. It had nothing to do with background checks because they didn't even exist until 4 years later in 1998.
A group that calls itself Handgun Control, Inc. claims that 25 to 50 percent of vendors at gun shows don't have federal firearm licenses. That fact is only true when it includes the vendors that are not selling guns at the show. Like those selling hot dogs, hats, t-shirts etc.
Then, Denver congresswoman Diana DeGette said that 70 percent of guns used in crimes come from gun shows. This is another lie. The Department of Justice asked 18,000 prison inmates what was the source of the gun they possessed at the time of their arrest. Only 7-tenths of one percent said it came from a gun show. The highest response by almost 40% was the "Streets".
Here's the truth in just one graph:
Essentially, gun-related homicides have fallen, while the number of guns owned has risen since 1993. Almost proportionately. In addition, and not shown on the graph, is the fact that non-fatal gun violence has fallen 68% over the same period. Also understand that 80% of all crimes are gang related. Yet, gun control advocates seem to think that it is the average gun owners that are the problem.
Simply, I tune out any talk of gun control because it is almost always based on lies. Also, our energies would be better focused on gang control and not gun control.
References:
Katie Couric slammed for 'deceptive' documentary about gun rights: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/05/26/katie-couric-slammed-for-deceptive-documentary-about-gun-rights.html
Katie Couric Decried ‘Edited’ Planned Parenthood Footage, Then Doctored A Gun Owner Interview: http://thefederalist.com/2016/05/26/katie-couric-decried-edited-planned-parenthood-footage-then-doctored-a-gun-owner-interview/
The Facts About Gun Shows: http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/facts-about-gun-shows
Fact Check: Clinton’s claim that 40 percent of guns are sold at gun shows and over the Internet: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/10/16/clintons-claim-that-40-percent-of-guns-are-sold-at-gun-shows-and-over-the-internet/
Firearm Use by Offenders: http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf
Source of Graph: https://www.aei.org/publication/chart-of-the-day-more-guns-less-gun-violence-between-1993-and-2013/
Gangs Blamed for 80 Percent of U.S. Crimes: http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/FedCrimes/story?id=6773423&page=1
pb
Showing posts with label deception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deception. Show all posts
Thursday, June 2, 2016
Thursday, November 13, 2014
The Selling Of ObamaCare: Exposing The Lies and Deception
Last year, ObamaCare and it's individual mandate were rolled out. As a result, (the President's lies that you could keep your doctor, and your insurance, and the average family would save $2500 a year) were clearly exposed.
In June 2010, the Obama Administration also made a quiet entry into the Federal Register, saying that it was projected that 93 million Americans would have their current insurance policies cancelled as a result of ObamaCare. Yet, past that date, the President continued to claim you could keep your present doctor.
Then, this year, one of the architects, Ezekiel Emanuel, wrote a book titled: "Reinventing American Health Care: How the Affordable Care Act Will Improve Our Terribly Complex, Blatantly Unjust, Outrageously Expensive, Grossly Inefficient, Error Prone System". In it, he clearly states that the ObamaCare law will cause two-thirds of the current employer-offered insurance policies to just go away. Apparently, from his words, this was intentional. Thus, adding to the deception that "if you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance".
But, more than anything, the words of another ObamaCare architect, Jonathan Gruber, tell of the deceit used to get ObamaCare passed into law:
But, Gruber also said this about two years ago:
When Nancy Pelosi said "we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what's in it", she clearly was admitting that the truth was being hidden from the American public. After all, it was crafted behind closed doors with the exclusion of any Republicans. Then, the near 3,000 page document was put to a vote before anyone could read it, let alone debate it.
If a corporation had lied this much to its customers, it would have been sued out of existence. But, the Democrats lied to the American people and only a few have been punished by losing their seats in Congress. As of January 2014, there will still be 44 Democrats in the Senate and 184 in the House of Representatives who will not have been punished for the deception and lies of their party and their President leading up to the passage of the Affordable Care Act.
References:
Obama Officials In 2010: 93 Million Americans Will Be Unable To Keep Their Health Plans Under Obamacare: http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/10/31/obama-officials-in-2010-93-million-americans-will-be-unable-to-keep-their-health-plans-under-obamacare/
Most Employers Will Drop Health Coverage: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Emanuel-employers-drop-health/2014/03/21/id/560906/
In June 2010, the Obama Administration also made a quiet entry into the Federal Register, saying that it was projected that 93 million Americans would have their current insurance policies cancelled as a result of ObamaCare. Yet, past that date, the President continued to claim you could keep your present doctor.
Then, this year, one of the architects, Ezekiel Emanuel, wrote a book titled: "Reinventing American Health Care: How the Affordable Care Act Will Improve Our Terribly Complex, Blatantly Unjust, Outrageously Expensive, Grossly Inefficient, Error Prone System". In it, he clearly states that the ObamaCare law will cause two-thirds of the current employer-offered insurance policies to just go away. Apparently, from his words, this was intentional. Thus, adding to the deception that "if you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance".
But, more than anything, the words of another ObamaCare architect, Jonathan Gruber, tell of the deceit used to get ObamaCare passed into law:
Essentially, he is saying they intentionally deceived the CBO. Further, he bragged about how they used the lack of transparency to fool the stupid American voters."This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. OK? So it's written to do that. In terms ofrisk-rated subsidies, if you had a law which said healthy people are going to payin — you made explicit that healthy people pay in and sick people getmoney — it would not have passed. OK? Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical to get the thing to pass. Look, Iwish ... we could make it all transparent, but I'd rather have this law than not."
But, Gruber also said this about two years ago:
"What’s important to remember politically about this is if you're a state and you don’t set up an exchange, that means your citizens don't get their tax credits—but your citizens still pay the taxes that support this bill. So you’re essentially saying [to] your citizens you’re going to pay all the taxes to help all the other states in the country. I hope that that's a blatant enough political reality that states will get their act together and realize there are billions of dollars at stake here in setting up these exchanges. But, you know, once again the politics can get ugly around this."The reason that these words are important is because in court case after court case, the Justice Department has argued the it was never the intent not to provide subsidies to states who didn't set up their own exchanges. Well, Gruber clearly shows that to be a lie. Now, the Supreme Court will hear the "subsidies" argument and one has to wonder how much of their decision will be based on Gruber's comments.
When Nancy Pelosi said "we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what's in it", she clearly was admitting that the truth was being hidden from the American public. After all, it was crafted behind closed doors with the exclusion of any Republicans. Then, the near 3,000 page document was put to a vote before anyone could read it, let alone debate it.
If a corporation had lied this much to its customers, it would have been sued out of existence. But, the Democrats lied to the American people and only a few have been punished by losing their seats in Congress. As of January 2014, there will still be 44 Democrats in the Senate and 184 in the House of Representatives who will not have been punished for the deception and lies of their party and their President leading up to the passage of the Affordable Care Act.
References:
Obama Officials In 2010: 93 Million Americans Will Be Unable To Keep Their Health Plans Under Obamacare: http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/10/31/obama-officials-in-2010-93-million-americans-will-be-unable-to-keep-their-health-plans-under-obamacare/
Most Employers Will Drop Health Coverage: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Emanuel-employers-drop-health/2014/03/21/id/560906/
Jonathan Gruber recently said Obamacare only passed due to the "stupidity" of the American voter and a lack of "transparency," and video footage of his remarks was deleted from the internet: http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/gruber.asp
Watch Obamacare Architect Jonathan Gruber Admit in 2012 That Subsidies Were Limited to State-Run Exchanges (Updated With Another Admission): http://reason.com/blog/2014/07/24/watch-obamacare-architect-jonathan-grube
Video: Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what's in it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoE1R-xH5To
Video: Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what's in it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoE1R-xH5To
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
