When the black, unwed and unemployed mother of six was videoed disciplining her son who was attempting to riot in the streets of Baltimore, she was literally hailed by many as the "mother of the year". Then, a day later, she was demonized for abusing her child. In my opinion, she is the face of a major problem for black women in this country: Unwed motherhood.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, 73% of all black children are born to women absent a husband (this based on 2010 data published in 2012), and it is a problem that is only getting worse. In 1960, the black unwed motherhood rate was only 22%. By 2006, 46 years later, it was slightly more than double the 1960 rate at 56%. Just 4 years later, it exploded to 73%? This means that out of nearly 635,000 births in 2013, at least a half million are without a father figure or without the social structure of a family. Of course, this assumes that the 73% has held since 2010, but if the past is any predictor, it is probably safe to assume that it is even higher. For all we know, it could now be be well above 80%.
Obviously, there must be reason that so many in the black community reject the normal family structure so important to raising children. One would think that, if you grew up in a poor single-parent family, you wouldn't want the same for your children. Apparently not. The reason is most likely because of the expansive welfare system that allows poor single mothers to survive without a husband, no matter how many children she has. The woman in the video, despite being unemployed with 6 kids, was well dressed and so was her son.
Following the 1996 welfare reforms signed into law by Bill Clinton, black poverty in this country fell to its lowest rate in history. The belief by Democrats that the poor would be dying in the streets never materialized. Since President Obama took office, he has made every attempt to dismantle those 1996 reforms, and now we have record numbers in poverty and an explosion in the rate of black children born to unwed mothers. If this isn't proof that Democrat-backed social programs aren't safety nets but, rather, programs that institutionalize poverty and destroy the family unit, I don't know what is.
References:
Mom of the year? Baltimore woman isn't a hero to all: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/04/29/baltimore-mom-smacks-son-riots/26574143/
Politifact: CNN's Don Lemon says more than 72 percent of African-American births are out of wedlock: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/jul/29/don-lemon/cnns-don-lemon-says-more-72-percent-african-americ/
Number of Births by Race in 2013: http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/births-by-raceethnicity/
How Obama has gutted welfare reform: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-obama-has-gutted-welfore-reform/2012/09/06/885b0092-f835-11e1-8b93-c4f4ab1c8d13_story.html
2003: The Continuing Good News About Welfare Reform: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/02/the-continuing-good-news
That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/7/obamas-rhetoric-on-fighting-poverty-doesnt-match-h/?page=all
Showing posts with label hero. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hero. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Drone Strikes: American Snipers at 30,000 Feet
As they say "War is hell". Everyone in the military is trained to kill; either directly or indirectly through some form of support action. So, as a veteran, I was more than a little annoyed to hear that Michael Moore had tweeted that the American Sniper, Chris Kyle, was a coward because he shoots people in the back.
I personally spent years, training over and over again, to direct fighter pilots in intercepts that would ultimately take out an enemy aircraft. While I was never in an actual combat role because, thank God, the Russians or other enemies never attacked us on our soil, I always knew that I would be responsible for the killing of an enemy pilot or flight crew if they had. Simply, because I would get our pilots into position to take that "kill shot". Of course, I did all this from the safe confines of a Long Range Radar Ops room. So, would Michael Moore call me a coward because I might direct our pilots to come up on the back of an enemy fighter, and fire a heat-seeking missile into the engine exhaust of that plane?
Today, our pilots aren't even at as much risk as before with the advent of unmanned drones. Drone pilots sit hundreds of miles away from their targets and take their "kill shots" from 30,000 feet. Would Michael Moore then call these people "cowards" for their actions? Is Obama a coward for ordering an ever increasing amount of drone strikes in Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Yemen?
Chris Kyle and all of our American snipers risk their lives in every mission that they are ordered to undertake. Unlike my job and those drone pilots, their job is to operate within enemy territory and get close enough to their target in order to take their "kill shot". Then, after firing that fatal shot, their lives are in even more danger because their mission is somewhat exposed by the fact that they have just killed someone. Unlike drones, which often have collateral civilian casualties and deaths, the sniper only tries to kill the exact target of his mission. All the time, taking out enemies that would kill other U.S. soldiers, our allies, or other friendly civilians. For this, a guy like Chris Kyle is a hero.
References:
Michael Moore, Rob Lowe snipe over 'American Sniper': http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/01/19/hollywood-split-over-american-sniper-success/
Drones: Death from 30,000 feet above: http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-drones/20090814.htm
Chris Kyle:
pb
I personally spent years, training over and over again, to direct fighter pilots in intercepts that would ultimately take out an enemy aircraft. While I was never in an actual combat role because, thank God, the Russians or other enemies never attacked us on our soil, I always knew that I would be responsible for the killing of an enemy pilot or flight crew if they had. Simply, because I would get our pilots into position to take that "kill shot". Of course, I did all this from the safe confines of a Long Range Radar Ops room. So, would Michael Moore call me a coward because I might direct our pilots to come up on the back of an enemy fighter, and fire a heat-seeking missile into the engine exhaust of that plane?
Today, our pilots aren't even at as much risk as before with the advent of unmanned drones. Drone pilots sit hundreds of miles away from their targets and take their "kill shots" from 30,000 feet. Would Michael Moore then call these people "cowards" for their actions? Is Obama a coward for ordering an ever increasing amount of drone strikes in Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Yemen?
Chris Kyle and all of our American snipers risk their lives in every mission that they are ordered to undertake. Unlike my job and those drone pilots, their job is to operate within enemy territory and get close enough to their target in order to take their "kill shot". Then, after firing that fatal shot, their lives are in even more danger because their mission is somewhat exposed by the fact that they have just killed someone. Unlike drones, which often have collateral civilian casualties and deaths, the sniper only tries to kill the exact target of his mission. All the time, taking out enemies that would kill other U.S. soldiers, our allies, or other friendly civilians. For this, a guy like Chris Kyle is a hero.
References:
Michael Moore, Rob Lowe snipe over 'American Sniper': http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/01/19/hollywood-split-over-american-sniper-success/
Drones: Death from 30,000 feet above: http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-drones/20090814.htm
Chris Kyle:
pb
Labels:
American Sniper,
Chris Kyle,
coward,
drones,
hero,
Michael Moore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)