This weekend, I heard one Democratic pundit say that when the text of the President's speech to our kids is released on Monday, the Republicans will be embarrassed by the fact that it is so politically benign.
The stupidity of that statement is the fact that we will never know what that speech was really going to say. This White House never, ever, released a prior statement as to what the President will be saying before they went ahead and told our nation's teachers to get prepared for the President's "command performance". For sure, it could have been greatly modified in those 5 days while this speech had blown up into such a heated issue.
But, let's be realistic. It wasn't really the speech, itself, that was at the true heart of the controversy. It was that lesson plan or course outline that accompanied the announcement of the speech. It didn't take a lot of imagination to get a little nervous about what was "in" that lesson plan. Even today, it still looks to be very much political in its content. For that reason, the President's team knew that they were literally caught red handed. To soft peddle this fact, they somewhat modified the outline to take out that clearly political step of thinking about ways to "help the President". But, this was just a ruse to make it look as if the White House was trying to be completely non-political. However, the other steps in the outline -- left up to the discretion of any completely left-leaning, Obama-loving union teacher --- could easily extend well beyond the non-political barriers and make that lesson plan a pure exercise in propaganda. In the days to come, I'm sure we'll hear about it.
For this very reason, I don't think there should have ever been a lesson plan. The fact that it even exists takes this speech out of the realm of being a simple pep-talk to our kids. Now, at the beginning of the school year, our children -- already failing at a rate of 30% across the nation and 50% in our major cities -- are being told that they now have to take "Obama 101" as part of their curriculum. That's what's wrong with this whole thing and that's why so many parents are so upset.
Obama doesn't get it.
Showing posts with label schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label schools. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Saturday, June 7, 2008
College is a "Birthright"?
In the "declaration" that he is the Democrat's nominee for President (See Full Text and Video of his Speech), Barack Obama made this comment within the context of his speech: "...in this global economy, the chance to get a college education should not be a privilege for the few, but a birthright of every American."
A birthright? Talk about a totally misplaced comment and a false sense of the education problems in this country!
If you listen to Barack Obama, the only thing he thinks that stands between a student's ability to graduate from college is the lack of any college tuition assistance. Like every Democrat, Mr. Obama seems to think that its always all about money. However, somebody should tell Mr. Obama that the problem lies in the "crap" (and getting crappier) pre-college educational system in this country. In Detroit, only 26% of the high school students actually graduate. In Obama's hometown of Chicago, the school system is only able to produce a 52% graduation rate. When students do go on to college from these and other "city" school systems, the failure rate, in the first two years of college, is extremely high. That's because those who graduate from those school systems don't have the skills needed to survive in a college environment. They haven't got the reading skills; the research and study skills; and, they don't have the discipline to meet the demands of a college curriculum. What's worse, if they are receiving some kind of tuition assistance, it is being wasted. Further, the college "slot" that they are taking is being wasted and being taken away from some student who might have better skills.
The focus for education in this country is to take a seriously hard look at our city schools systems. I guarantee you that even if you doubled the pay for every teacher in America, you would get the same graduation rates that we have today. It isn't all pay. Just paying a poor performing teacher or teachers isn't going to solve the problem. We need a system of measuring a teacher's performance and paying them accordingly. Those who are poor performing, should be eliminated. Students will need math and science skills to compete in a global economy. In order to attract educators who are versed in those disciplines, we need give them higher pay scales than the average "Bachelor of Arts" school teacher. But, all this goes against the grain of a unionized system of education in this country.
To the teacher's union, no one teacher is better or more important than another. Everyone is equal. The pay for one should be the same as the pay for another. The quality of teaching is of no concern. There are no better or worse teachers among the group. It also doesn't matter if one teacher has a Bachelor of Arts in "literature" (like so many) and another has a Bachelor of Science degree (which is sorely needed). And, try to "fire" any poor performing teacher!
Beyond the education system and our teacher's, there are serious and deep social issues. Year's ago, our society wouldn't accept a 90% graduation rate. The parents would be in an uproar. Today, we accept 1/2 or less of the class being graduated. This malaise is systemic to our entire society. We have become lazy. We, too often, are spoiled into believing that hard work is for the fools. We aren't hungry. But, the rest of the world is just the opposite. Like in sports....when an athlete has the "hunger", he or she will generally win.
A birthright? Talk about a totally misplaced comment and a false sense of the education problems in this country!
If you listen to Barack Obama, the only thing he thinks that stands between a student's ability to graduate from college is the lack of any college tuition assistance. Like every Democrat, Mr. Obama seems to think that its always all about money. However, somebody should tell Mr. Obama that the problem lies in the "crap" (and getting crappier) pre-college educational system in this country. In Detroit, only 26% of the high school students actually graduate. In Obama's hometown of Chicago, the school system is only able to produce a 52% graduation rate. When students do go on to college from these and other "city" school systems, the failure rate, in the first two years of college, is extremely high. That's because those who graduate from those school systems don't have the skills needed to survive in a college environment. They haven't got the reading skills; the research and study skills; and, they don't have the discipline to meet the demands of a college curriculum. What's worse, if they are receiving some kind of tuition assistance, it is being wasted. Further, the college "slot" that they are taking is being wasted and being taken away from some student who might have better skills.
The focus for education in this country is to take a seriously hard look at our city schools systems. I guarantee you that even if you doubled the pay for every teacher in America, you would get the same graduation rates that we have today. It isn't all pay. Just paying a poor performing teacher or teachers isn't going to solve the problem. We need a system of measuring a teacher's performance and paying them accordingly. Those who are poor performing, should be eliminated. Students will need math and science skills to compete in a global economy. In order to attract educators who are versed in those disciplines, we need give them higher pay scales than the average "Bachelor of Arts" school teacher. But, all this goes against the grain of a unionized system of education in this country.
To the teacher's union, no one teacher is better or more important than another. Everyone is equal. The pay for one should be the same as the pay for another. The quality of teaching is of no concern. There are no better or worse teachers among the group. It also doesn't matter if one teacher has a Bachelor of Arts in "literature" (like so many) and another has a Bachelor of Science degree (which is sorely needed). And, try to "fire" any poor performing teacher!
Beyond the education system and our teacher's, there are serious and deep social issues. Year's ago, our society wouldn't accept a 90% graduation rate. The parents would be in an uproar. Today, we accept 1/2 or less of the class being graduated. This malaise is systemic to our entire society. We have become lazy. We, too often, are spoiled into believing that hard work is for the fools. We aren't hungry. But, the rest of the world is just the opposite. Like in sports....when an athlete has the "hunger", he or she will generally win.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
