This whole flap about Van Jones (Click to See This Commentary/Story: "Who to credit for recruiting vetting Van Jones, Obama's 'Green Jobs Czar'? ") clearly shows why Obama has appointed so many czars. It was very intentional. It all has to do with the fact that Van Jones and many of the others designated as czars by Barack Obama would never have made it through the normal congressional approval process for any cabinet or under-secretary positions. They all have too many skeletons in their closets and many have absolutely radical and anti-American views.
Quite frankly, these appointees collectively provide a "true insight" into the psyche and truly radical opinions of this President. From all that I have either read, watched, or heard, I can only assume that, like William Ayers and Reverend Wright, Barack Obama surely knew of these people's pasts and their radical beliefs; and, he clearly sought out their advice. There appears to be very few degrees of separation among any of them.
Merely go to Barack Obama's own book, "Dreams From My Father", and listen to the following words to know this to be true:
Don't just take this as truth from me or Glenn Beck or Fox News. Google it for yourself. Its not hard to find.
Lastly, I think Van Jones will be cut loose by Tuesday. I don't think Obama wants to go into his Wednesday speech before a joint session of Congress with that particular boat anchor around his legs. Van Jones will have be thrown under the same bus that he had to throw Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers under. Now counting three radicals with, I'll bet, more to come!
Showing posts with label radicals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label radicals. Show all posts
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Sunday, March 8, 2009
Radicalism
In Religion..
Generally, the followers of radical preachings believe what they are told rather than to research the truth. The purveyors of radicalism will present arguments for their causes that are designed to incite despair and/or anger. There is always just enough superficial truth to sound convincing. The followers only hear what they want to hear and rebel violently against those who disagree with them. They would prefer to take a few pieces of a puzzle, or even a single piece, to support their beliefs, rather than look at the total mosaic. No amount of logical thought will ever change their minds!
In Politics...
Generally, the far left and far right of any political party believe in what they are told rather than research the truth. The politicians of the far right and far left will present arguments for their causes that are designed to incite despair and/or anger. There is always just enough superficial truth to sound convincing. The followers only hear what they want to hear and rebel violently against those who disagree with them. They would prefer to take a few pieces of a puzzle, or even a single piece, to support their beliefs, rather than look at the total mosaic. No amount of logical thought will ever change their minds!
Generally, the followers of radical preachings believe what they are told rather than to research the truth. The purveyors of radicalism will present arguments for their causes that are designed to incite despair and/or anger. There is always just enough superficial truth to sound convincing. The followers only hear what they want to hear and rebel violently against those who disagree with them. They would prefer to take a few pieces of a puzzle, or even a single piece, to support their beliefs, rather than look at the total mosaic. No amount of logical thought will ever change their minds!
In Politics...
Generally, the far left and far right of any political party believe in what they are told rather than research the truth. The politicians of the far right and far left will present arguments for their causes that are designed to incite despair and/or anger. There is always just enough superficial truth to sound convincing. The followers only hear what they want to hear and rebel violently against those who disagree with them. They would prefer to take a few pieces of a puzzle, or even a single piece, to support their beliefs, rather than look at the total mosaic. No amount of logical thought will ever change their minds!
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Change You "Can't" Believe In
Barack Obama's campaign is all about change. A change, supposedly, for the better. However, the one time in his life that he was actually "charged" with making a change for the better, he failed and he failed miserably.
From 1995 until 2000, Barack Obama chaired the now-defunct, Chicago Annenberg Challenge ("CAC") which was, in theory, intended to improve the performance of the city schools of Chicago (See Project Overview). Obama's so-called "neighbor" and "not really" a close friend, William Ayers, a subversive radical leader and bomber for the Weatherman/Weather Underground (See Ayers' Bio), authored the request for funding and outlined the program. He Co-Chaired with Obama. Dissolved in 2001, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge burned millions of wasted dollars and resulted in a failed experiment.
For me, this episode in Mr. Obama's life clearly highlights doubts about his ability to take the highest office in this country.
First, Obama must have thought that this program would make a change in the educational system in Chicago or, else, he wouldn't have taken the directorship. The fact that he wasn't able to achieve the desired results reflects heavily on his ability to lead and get the job done. Further, it is apparent that the thrust of the project was flawed; resulting in its cancellation in six short years and only a year after Obama left the helm. This reflects on Obama's judgment skills. It shows he wasn't able to sort out the merits of a program and whether or not it would be successful. During this campaign, he has outlined a number of programs from universal health care to wind and solar energy programs. They amount to a near trillion dollars worth of proposals. Not just the few millions that were wasted for the CAC. One can only wonder about the successfulness of his near trillion dollars in programs. Programs that, if they were to fail like the CAC, would cost billions of dollars and that would affect an entire nation; not just a few million wasted dollars in the city of Chicago.
Another thing that comes out of the CAC debacle is the fact that, once again (See Full Story), Obama is being closely connected to William Ayers. Obama has claimed that Ayers was just a neighbor and, what Ayers did against this country, he did when he (Obama) was only 8 years old. Obama started his Senatorial campaign out of Ayers home. He associated with him at the University of Chicago. He co-chaired the CAC. He overlapped directorship of the Woods Fund in Chicago. There are just too many connections to Ayers for Obama to claim that Mr. Ayers is just a mere "neighbor". Ayers is an anti-American socialist that doesn't believe in this country. In fact, in a 2001 Chicago Magazine article he was photographed stomping on the American Flag (See Full Story). As the story goes on to say, Ayers has no regrets in what he did against America. Despite all that, Obama appears not to have distanced himself from Ayers. Like Obama, Ayers has also believed in "change" for America. It just so happens that the Ayers view of "change" isn't hardly the popular view of America. There is an old saying about "birds of a feather" and you have to wonder if it applies in this case. From Rev. Wright to Ayers to Bernadine Dorhn (Ayers wife) to Rashid Khalidi (a pro-Palestinian/anti-Jew --- See Full Story), Obama has manage to surround himself with more radical friends that any other American would have in a whole lifetime.
Finally, the University of Illinois in Chicago (UIC) houses the "dead" records of the CAC. They are hidden away in a storeroom of the Daley Library. Clearly the CAC was a public program and the UIC/Daley Library is a publicly-funded school. However, access to these records have been blocked. You've really got to wonder what lies in those boxes of records and what nobody seems to want investigative reporters to look at. Is there something about either Ayers or Obama, or both, that is being hidden? Were there misappropriations of public money that aren't being told? I lived in Chicago for years, and that city has a long history of political corruption. I personally think there is a story there. However, don't expect the Obama-loving, mainstream media to uncover the true facts about the CAC and Obama. I guarantee you that if the CAC had been in McCain's past, the New York Times would have already published it. In fact, the "Times" would have probably serialized it on their front page from now until the election!
From 1995 until 2000, Barack Obama chaired the now-defunct, Chicago Annenberg Challenge ("CAC") which was, in theory, intended to improve the performance of the city schools of Chicago (See Project Overview). Obama's so-called "neighbor" and "not really" a close friend, William Ayers, a subversive radical leader and bomber for the Weatherman/Weather Underground (See Ayers' Bio), authored the request for funding and outlined the program. He Co-Chaired with Obama. Dissolved in 2001, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge burned millions of wasted dollars and resulted in a failed experiment.
For me, this episode in Mr. Obama's life clearly highlights doubts about his ability to take the highest office in this country.
First, Obama must have thought that this program would make a change in the educational system in Chicago or, else, he wouldn't have taken the directorship. The fact that he wasn't able to achieve the desired results reflects heavily on his ability to lead and get the job done. Further, it is apparent that the thrust of the project was flawed; resulting in its cancellation in six short years and only a year after Obama left the helm. This reflects on Obama's judgment skills. It shows he wasn't able to sort out the merits of a program and whether or not it would be successful. During this campaign, he has outlined a number of programs from universal health care to wind and solar energy programs. They amount to a near trillion dollars worth of proposals. Not just the few millions that were wasted for the CAC. One can only wonder about the successfulness of his near trillion dollars in programs. Programs that, if they were to fail like the CAC, would cost billions of dollars and that would affect an entire nation; not just a few million wasted dollars in the city of Chicago.
Another thing that comes out of the CAC debacle is the fact that, once again (See Full Story), Obama is being closely connected to William Ayers. Obama has claimed that Ayers was just a neighbor and, what Ayers did against this country, he did when he (Obama) was only 8 years old. Obama started his Senatorial campaign out of Ayers home. He associated with him at the University of Chicago. He co-chaired the CAC. He overlapped directorship of the Woods Fund in Chicago. There are just too many connections to Ayers for Obama to claim that Mr. Ayers is just a mere "neighbor". Ayers is an anti-American socialist that doesn't believe in this country. In fact, in a 2001 Chicago Magazine article he was photographed stomping on the American Flag (See Full Story). As the story goes on to say, Ayers has no regrets in what he did against America. Despite all that, Obama appears not to have distanced himself from Ayers. Like Obama, Ayers has also believed in "change" for America. It just so happens that the Ayers view of "change" isn't hardly the popular view of America. There is an old saying about "birds of a feather" and you have to wonder if it applies in this case. From Rev. Wright to Ayers to Bernadine Dorhn (Ayers wife) to Rashid Khalidi (a pro-Palestinian/anti-Jew --- See Full Story), Obama has manage to surround himself with more radical friends that any other American would have in a whole lifetime.
Finally, the University of Illinois in Chicago (UIC) houses the "dead" records of the CAC. They are hidden away in a storeroom of the Daley Library. Clearly the CAC was a public program and the UIC/Daley Library is a publicly-funded school. However, access to these records have been blocked. You've really got to wonder what lies in those boxes of records and what nobody seems to want investigative reporters to look at. Is there something about either Ayers or Obama, or both, that is being hidden? Were there misappropriations of public money that aren't being told? I lived in Chicago for years, and that city has a long history of political corruption. I personally think there is a story there. However, don't expect the Obama-loving, mainstream media to uncover the true facts about the CAC and Obama. I guarantee you that if the CAC had been in McCain's past, the New York Times would have already published it. In fact, the "Times" would have probably serialized it on their front page from now until the election!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
