Senator Dianne Feinstein has released her Democrat-staff-written report on CIA torture during the George W. Bush years following 9/11. In that report, we will find that the CIA used various forms of "psychological" interrogation techniques -- which Feinstein calls torture -- such as water boarding; which makes the person feel that they are drowning, when in fact, they are not, or, we see that we used various forms of sleep deprivation.
But, nowhere in that report will you find extreme forms of physical torture used like those seen in other countries where people are left bloodied by constant blows, have their bones broken, have certain parts of their bodies electrocuted, or have fingers and toes cut off.
As a country, we don't torture people in those ways. We've signed both the Geneva and UN Conventions that ban tortured interrogations on any prisoners or prisoners of war.
However, other countries are well versed in those physical torture techniques and, there is nothing in either the Geneva or UN Conventions that prevent us from using those countries to obtain information by those means that we, ourselves, are prevented from using.
That is why President Bill Clinton authorized the CIA to use something called "extraordinary rendition" to transfer abducted enemies-of-the-U.S. to countries who practiced true physical torture. In this way, America could (theoretically) keep its hands clean in the process. When Bush took office, that practice was stopped and the CIA used "enhanced interrogation" techniques at American facilities. Techniques that were well restrained in comparison to what Bill Clinton authorized and which the Bush Administration felt were acceptable under previously signed Conventions.
Another thing that Feinstein doesn't seem remember is the fact Clinton's Attorney General, Janet Reno, used sleep deprivation against the Branch Dividians in Waco, Texas. Yes, that's right Texas. For days, loud music and high intensity spotlights were used to deprive the Dividians of sleep.
It is interesting that Dianne Feinstein solely focused on the Bush years, and never once, thought of including the Clinton years in her report, when the torture process was totally unrestrained.
Lastly, Senator Feinstein claims the interrogation techniques used were ineffective because they yielded false information that was purely being given to the CIA interrogators in order to stop what she calls torture. Really? Does anyone really think our CIA was so stupid to think that people wouldn't attempt to lie to them during an interrogation? Everything that was learned had to be verifiable. This was especially true when enhanced interrogation techniques lead to the disclosure of Bin Laden's personal courier's name. It was the courier's house that Bin Laden was staying in when he was killed by our Special Forces team. Also, if enhanced interrogation was so ineffective, why did the CIA continue to use it for six years after 9/11?
CIA torture report brands post-9/11 program as brutal and ineffective: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/09/cia-torture-report-released
Extraordinary rendition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition
January 2009: Panetta faces rendition queries: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/15/panetta-faces-rendition-queries/?page=all
The deaths of Special Agents Todd McKeehan, Conway LeBleu, Robert Williams and Steve Willis
resulted in a prolonged stand-off involving psychological operations
tactics from the mission to capture Manuel Noriega in 1989. These
included the playing of loud music, recordings of planes and chanting in
addition to the use of spotlights to deprive the Branch Davidians of
United Nations Convention against Torture - Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Convention_against_Torture
Enhanced interrogation techniques: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_interrogation_techniques
Did Harsh Interrogation Tactics Lead To Bin Laden?: http://www.npr.org/2011/05/05/136005405/did-harsh-interrogation-tactics-lead-to-bin-laden