Many wonder how a 74-year-old socialist candidate can be doing so well in our capitalist society. The answer is simple. Socialism rises out of discontent regarding the economy and jobs. When people think that they are not getting a fair shake and the rich are getting richer while they keep getting poorer, socialism seems an attractive solution. Even as flawed as that assumption is, after 7+ years of Obama, those aren't just perceptions...they're realities.
Currently, we have a record 47 million Americans in poverty; and that number rose again in the latest reporting. Pre-recession the number was 10 million less, at about $37 million.
Then, there is this chart:
As this shows, the bottom 99% saw their incomes rise by less than 1% per year over the first five years of the Obama Administration. To put this into perspective, in 2006 and 2007, wages grew at an average of 4% per year. In the 1970's and 1980's, it was not uncommon for salaries to grow by 8% or 9% or more.
In addition to all of that, the middle class keeps shrinking. Today, only 45.8% of Americans find themselves in that segment of the population. Well below the normal target of 50% or more, and certainly below the 53% that were in the middle class in the 1960's. In fact, the median household's income and buying power is where it was in 1996. This is also why the greatest contributors to Sanders' campaign are the unemployed. Nearly 29% of donations are coming from this class of worker.
Simply, the conditions are ripe for the false promises of socialism to take hold and Bernie is the beneficiary. The American dream is dissolving before our eyes. What worries me is that, if Hillary Clinton becomes President, we will have another 4 years of Obama's policies and a further decline in wages and the middle class. Poverty and income inequality will likely continue to rise. If so, America is sure to become a socialist nation in the future. Mark my words.
References:
Source of Chart: Obama's Economy in 7 Charts: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: http://fortune.com/2016/01/12/obama-economy-charts/
Poverty in the United States, 2007: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104520.html
Record 46.7 Million Americans Live In Poverty: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-16/record-467-million-americans-live-poverty-median-houshold-income-back-1989-levels
5 Charts That Show How the Middle Class Is Disappearing: http://billmoyers.com/2015/01/26/middle-class/
The Shrinking American Middle Class: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/01/25/upshot/shrinking-middle-class.html?version=meter+at+1&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click
Our analysis of nearly 7 million donations offers unprecedented detail about the army that's funded his insurgent campaign: http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-sanders-donors/
Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts
Thursday, June 9, 2016
Monday, May 16, 2016
Venezuela: Another Socialist Utopia Falls Asunder
Socialists always believe that government is the best way to control the destiny of mankind. They believe that without complete government control over people's lives, income inequality will rule and that the rich will get richer and the poor, poorer.
Such was the case in Venezuela. Hugo Chavez in 1998 -- when elected President -- was to turn Venezuela into a socialist utopia with the working class and the poor finally enjoying a better life in a country he felt only served the rich. All of this would would be based on a revolutionary movement that he founded in 1982 called the "Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement-200".
Properties were seized and given to the poor. He took control of the media and the supreme court to insure that there was no insurrection while he did what he needed to do to bring Marxism to his country. He even managed to make himself "El Presidente" for life. Even though Chavez died young in 2013, his dream was continued by his successor President Maduro -- his former Vice President.
Today, Venezuela is an economic mess. There is no food on store shelves. Even toilet paper is in short supply. Inflation is completely out of control, and this year is expected to exceed 700%; well up from last year's 180% and 172%. That means that prices went up 1000% in just 3 years. Not exactly the ideal inflation rate of 2 to 3%. Because the country is so dependent on oil export revenues, the extreme fall in oil prices has further crippled its economy.
On top of everything else, electricity is in short supply because they were too dependent on hydro-electric power, This, in a country that is awash with oil. In order to conserve electricity, government workers have recently had their workweek cut to two days -- Thursday and Friday. As it is, the country's 2 million government workers had already had the workday slashed to 6 hours. This latest move by Maduro means that the government workers will only work 12 hours a week. This simply means that the country will fall into more turmoil as government services are even more severely curtailed.
Once again, this proves that Socialism does not work. And, I believe that Venezuela will again see another upheaval that will overturn the Chavez-designed Marxist government; and, it could be a violent revolution. The truth is, it may be too late to do anything to fix the country since it has been damaged so much in the last 18 years. The legacy of Hugo Chavez is that Venezuela may wind up being the poorest country in South America. Just the opposite of his original utopian dream.
References:
Hugo Chavez: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Ch%C3%A1vez
Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement-200: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Bolivarian_Movement-200
Nicolas Maduro: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicol%C3%A1s_Maduro
Shortages in Venezuela - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortages_in_Venezuela
Venezuela Inflation: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/venezuela/inflation-cpi
IMF Sees Venezuela Inflation Rocketing to 720 Percent in 2016: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-22/imf-sees-venezuela-inflation-rocketing-to-720-percent-in-2016
Venezuela enforces public sector leave on three weekdays: https://www.yahoo.com/news/venezuela-enforces-public-sector-leave-three-weekdays-230119339.html?ref=gs
U.S. concern grows over possible Venezuela meltdown - officials: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-usa-idUSKCN0Y42MT
pb
Such was the case in Venezuela. Hugo Chavez in 1998 -- when elected President -- was to turn Venezuela into a socialist utopia with the working class and the poor finally enjoying a better life in a country he felt only served the rich. All of this would would be based on a revolutionary movement that he founded in 1982 called the "Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement-200".
Properties were seized and given to the poor. He took control of the media and the supreme court to insure that there was no insurrection while he did what he needed to do to bring Marxism to his country. He even managed to make himself "El Presidente" for life. Even though Chavez died young in 2013, his dream was continued by his successor President Maduro -- his former Vice President.
Today, Venezuela is an economic mess. There is no food on store shelves. Even toilet paper is in short supply. Inflation is completely out of control, and this year is expected to exceed 700%; well up from last year's 180% and 172%. That means that prices went up 1000% in just 3 years. Not exactly the ideal inflation rate of 2 to 3%. Because the country is so dependent on oil export revenues, the extreme fall in oil prices has further crippled its economy.
On top of everything else, electricity is in short supply because they were too dependent on hydro-electric power, This, in a country that is awash with oil. In order to conserve electricity, government workers have recently had their workweek cut to two days -- Thursday and Friday. As it is, the country's 2 million government workers had already had the workday slashed to 6 hours. This latest move by Maduro means that the government workers will only work 12 hours a week. This simply means that the country will fall into more turmoil as government services are even more severely curtailed.
Once again, this proves that Socialism does not work. And, I believe that Venezuela will again see another upheaval that will overturn the Chavez-designed Marxist government; and, it could be a violent revolution. The truth is, it may be too late to do anything to fix the country since it has been damaged so much in the last 18 years. The legacy of Hugo Chavez is that Venezuela may wind up being the poorest country in South America. Just the opposite of his original utopian dream.
References:
Hugo Chavez: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Ch%C3%A1vez
Revolutionary Bolivarian Movement-200: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Bolivarian_Movement-200
Nicolas Maduro: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicol%C3%A1s_Maduro
Shortages in Venezuela - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortages_in_Venezuela
Venezuela Inflation: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/venezuela/inflation-cpi
IMF Sees Venezuela Inflation Rocketing to 720 Percent in 2016: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-22/imf-sees-venezuela-inflation-rocketing-to-720-percent-in-2016
Venezuela enforces public sector leave on three weekdays: https://www.yahoo.com/news/venezuela-enforces-public-sector-leave-three-weekdays-230119339.html?ref=gs
U.S. concern grows over possible Venezuela meltdown - officials: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-usa-idUSKCN0Y42MT
pb
Labels:
collapse,
economy,
electricity,
hugo chavez,
inflation,
Maduro,
revolution,
socialism,
Venezuela
Thursday, February 11, 2016
Hillary Still Has It! Losing and Losing Even Bigger
Hillary barely won in Iowa. Then, in New Hampshire, she totally flamed out; giving Bernie Sanders a 22 point lead. Most political analysts consider any win of 10 points or more a landslide. So, let's say it. Hillary lost by a landslide.
Team Clinton blamed Bernie's big win on the fact that New Hampshire voters were inclined to vote for Sanders because he comes from a neighboring state. But, let's not forget the New Hampshire's motto: "Live Free or Die". Maybe that is why Bernie really won. After all that's what he wants. Free healthcare. Free college. Free pre-K. Free child care. Free, free, and even freer. Otherwise, we'll all die. Of course, his $18 trillion of new spending won't come free to the people who actually have to pay the bill. So, I guess Hillary lost because she just wasn't as "free" with America's taxes as Bernie.
The point is that Bernie is selling socialism; Hillary, not so. Thus, if she wants to beat the "Bern" she better start piling on the free stuff. Hell, by the time November rolls around, they'll have us all living in full furnished government housing. The new Obama-phone will be a free car. We probably won't have to work because we'll all be on some form of expanded Social Security and only the millionaires and billionaires will be left working to pay all the bills. And, life will be great.
References:
How Clinton plans to bounce back in New Hampshire: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/how-clinton-plans-to-bounce-back-in-new-hampshire-218663
Hillary Clinton’s team tries to downplay expectations in N.H.: http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2016/02/07/hillary-clinton-keeps-expectations-low-for-new-hampshire-primary/QpNAQcFlza3L41i5WV345I/story.html
Price Tag of Bernie Sanders’s Proposals: $18 Trillion: https://www.google.com/search?q=Price+Tag+of+Bernie+Sanders%E2%80%99s+Proposals%3A+%2418+Trillion&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Team Clinton blamed Bernie's big win on the fact that New Hampshire voters were inclined to vote for Sanders because he comes from a neighboring state. But, let's not forget the New Hampshire's motto: "Live Free or Die". Maybe that is why Bernie really won. After all that's what he wants. Free healthcare. Free college. Free pre-K. Free child care. Free, free, and even freer. Otherwise, we'll all die. Of course, his $18 trillion of new spending won't come free to the people who actually have to pay the bill. So, I guess Hillary lost because she just wasn't as "free" with America's taxes as Bernie.
The point is that Bernie is selling socialism; Hillary, not so. Thus, if she wants to beat the "Bern" she better start piling on the free stuff. Hell, by the time November rolls around, they'll have us all living in full furnished government housing. The new Obama-phone will be a free car. We probably won't have to work because we'll all be on some form of expanded Social Security and only the millionaires and billionaires will be left working to pay all the bills. And, life will be great.
References:
How Clinton plans to bounce back in New Hampshire: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/how-clinton-plans-to-bounce-back-in-new-hampshire-218663
Hillary Clinton’s team tries to downplay expectations in N.H.: http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2016/02/07/hillary-clinton-keeps-expectations-low-for-new-hampshire-primary/QpNAQcFlza3L41i5WV345I/story.html
Price Tag of Bernie Sanders’s Proposals: $18 Trillion: https://www.google.com/search?q=Price+Tag+of+Bernie+Sanders%E2%80%99s+Proposals%3A+%2418+Trillion&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Labels:
free stuff,
Hillary Clinton,
Iowa,
loser,
New Hampshire,
socialism
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
Clinton, O'Malley, & Sanders: American Corporations and Their CEO's Are Under Siege
When Martin O'Malley announced his candidacy, he took aim at American CEO's.
First he said:
Also, he said this:
Later, O'Malley made the comment that he is happy to be 'the last person' Wall Street CEOs want running in 2016. Which, is not even a veiled threat that, if elected, he would go after America's engine of economic growth.
Then, there's Bernie Sanders.
Early on in his campaign, he said he would be fine with a 90% tax on the wealthy. He also took aim at 18 CEO's that he claimed took billions in bailouts, outsourced jobs, and dodged taxes. One of those was Jeffery Immelt of GE who sits on President Obama's Economic Council.
Rounding out the attack on CEO hatred, there's Hillary Clinton.
In the first month of her campaign, she claimed the average CEO was payed 400 times that of an average worker, and as such, if she was elected, she would do something about that. However, this statistic only narrowly applies to 350 of the nearly 1/4 million CEO's in the country. The median salary for those top-paid CEO's is $15.1 million while the median salary for most is a little over $173,000. Obviously, she wants to pit the workers against the CEO's in her effort to get elected.
What all of this shows is that the Democratic party and its presidential candidates have become more and more anti-wealth and anti-business socialists. This at a time when most of Europe has figured out that socialism doesn't work and are now trying to throw that form of politics and economics overboard.
References:
Martin O’Malley announces presidential campaign: http://nypost.com/2015/05/30/martin-omalley-announces-presidential-campaign/
Martin O'Malley is happy to be 'the last person' Wall Street CEOs want running in 2016: http://www.businessinsider.com/martin-omalley-is-happy-to-be-the-last-person-wall-street-ceos-want-running-in-2016-2015-6
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) doesn't think a 90 percent tax rate on the richest is too high in order to combat income inequality.: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/05/26/3662773/sanders-90-percent-tax/
Bernie Sanders Exposes 18 CEOs who took Trillions in Bailouts, Evaded Taxes and Outsourced Jobs: http://www.politicususa.com/2012/10/25/bernie-sanders-exposes-18-ceos-trillions-bailouts-evaded-taxes-outsourced-jobs.html
Fact check: Hillary Clinton misuses stat on CEO pay: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/05/21/fact-check-hillary-clinton-ceo-pay/27719353/
Poll: Dems now have as favorable a view of socialism as they do capitalism: http://libertyunyielding.com/2015/05/12/poll-dems-now-have-as-favorable-a-view-of-socialism-as-they-do-of-capitalism/
Europe: Social-democratic parties are in crisis everywhere — ideological and political: http://www.politico.eu/article/europes-lonely-socialist/
First he said:
"I’ve got news for the bullies of Wall Street: The presidency is not a crown to be passed back and forth by you between two royal families."The term "bullies of Wall Street" certainly implies some deep seated hatred of these companies and their execs.
Also, he said this:
"Tell me how it is that not a single Wall Street CEO was convicted of a crime related to the 2008 economic meltdown."Well, maybe because the meltdown was more about legislative and political efforts and the position that Wall Street and the Banks were put into in order to push for low income and poor home ownership.
Later, O'Malley made the comment that he is happy to be 'the last person' Wall Street CEOs want running in 2016. Which, is not even a veiled threat that, if elected, he would go after America's engine of economic growth.
Then, there's Bernie Sanders.
Early on in his campaign, he said he would be fine with a 90% tax on the wealthy. He also took aim at 18 CEO's that he claimed took billions in bailouts, outsourced jobs, and dodged taxes. One of those was Jeffery Immelt of GE who sits on President Obama's Economic Council.
Rounding out the attack on CEO hatred, there's Hillary Clinton.
In the first month of her campaign, she claimed the average CEO was payed 400 times that of an average worker, and as such, if she was elected, she would do something about that. However, this statistic only narrowly applies to 350 of the nearly 1/4 million CEO's in the country. The median salary for those top-paid CEO's is $15.1 million while the median salary for most is a little over $173,000. Obviously, she wants to pit the workers against the CEO's in her effort to get elected.
What all of this shows is that the Democratic party and its presidential candidates have become more and more anti-wealth and anti-business socialists. This at a time when most of Europe has figured out that socialism doesn't work and are now trying to throw that form of politics and economics overboard.
References:
Martin O’Malley announces presidential campaign: http://nypost.com/2015/05/30/martin-omalley-announces-presidential-campaign/
Martin O'Malley is happy to be 'the last person' Wall Street CEOs want running in 2016: http://www.businessinsider.com/martin-omalley-is-happy-to-be-the-last-person-wall-street-ceos-want-running-in-2016-2015-6
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) doesn't think a 90 percent tax rate on the richest is too high in order to combat income inequality.: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/05/26/3662773/sanders-90-percent-tax/
Bernie Sanders Exposes 18 CEOs who took Trillions in Bailouts, Evaded Taxes and Outsourced Jobs: http://www.politicususa.com/2012/10/25/bernie-sanders-exposes-18-ceos-trillions-bailouts-evaded-taxes-outsourced-jobs.html
Fact check: Hillary Clinton misuses stat on CEO pay: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/05/21/fact-check-hillary-clinton-ceo-pay/27719353/
Poll: Dems now have as favorable a view of socialism as they do capitalism: http://libertyunyielding.com/2015/05/12/poll-dems-now-have-as-favorable-a-view-of-socialism-as-they-do-of-capitalism/
Europe: Social-democratic parties are in crisis everywhere — ideological and political: http://www.politico.eu/article/europes-lonely-socialist/
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Bernie Sander's Fascination With Scandinavian Economies
During the Democrat Debate, Bernie Sanders, the consummate socialist, remarked that we should model our economy after European countries such as Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. Of course, the only reason he mentioned these Scandinavian countries is because they're socialist, cradle-to-grave nanny states that have shown themselves able to provide a high standard of living. Other European socialist states like Spain, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Ireland are struggling to survive.
But, what Sanders doesn't seem understand, is that these countries have small populations; less than 10 million people with a wealth of huge stores of natural resources -- relative to their population -- which strongly helps to support their economy. More importantly, the Nordic race has a very strong work ethic. As a result, the unemployment rates and poverty levels are fairly low. A strong work ethic also means that there is very little corruption. Thus, there is little government interference in business activities in terms of regulations; making them one of the most freely capitalist economies in the world. Additionally, that same work ethic means that their population is better educated; and this too results in stronger businesses and the creation of new businesses.
Here's the simple fact. None of the above attributes of these Scandinavian countries are transferable to this country. Just as the failure of socialism to work in Greece. Our highly mixed population and our economic base are totally different. Also, understand how much those countries pay to achieve the level of socialism they have today. For example, in Sweden, the cost to pay for their programs is equal to more than half (51.9%) of that nation's total economic output; as measured by Gross Domestic Product. In this country, our government outlays are $3.5 trillion on an economy of $17.4 trillion; or, just 20% of our Gross Domestic Product. In order to achieve what Sweden has achieved, we would have to have massive increases in federal taxes. Even more, if we want the current $18+ trillion debt reduced or eliminated. Probably a third of all workers would work for the government.
Lastly, to pay for all this socialism, these countries tax everyone in the form of a Value Added Tax. A form of a 25% national sales tax (not applicable to food and some services that would impact tourism). That's because simply taxing the rich -- as Bernie Sanders would suggest -- won't even come close to paying for the large increase in socialism he is proposing.
References:
Clinton, Sanders spar over capitalism, gun control at Democratic presidential debate: http://www.amny.com/news/clinton-sanders-spar-over-capitalism-gun-control-at-democratic-presidential-debate-1.10959244
Economy and Business Environment: http://www.heritage.org/index/country/sweden
Is Sweden a False Utopia: http://www.newgeography.com/content/001543-is-sweden-a-false-utopia
Does Scandinavian Socialism Work?: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/101480/does-scandinavian-socialism-work-steven-plaut
But, what Sanders doesn't seem understand, is that these countries have small populations; less than 10 million people with a wealth of huge stores of natural resources -- relative to their population -- which strongly helps to support their economy. More importantly, the Nordic race has a very strong work ethic. As a result, the unemployment rates and poverty levels are fairly low. A strong work ethic also means that there is very little corruption. Thus, there is little government interference in business activities in terms of regulations; making them one of the most freely capitalist economies in the world. Additionally, that same work ethic means that their population is better educated; and this too results in stronger businesses and the creation of new businesses.
Here's the simple fact. None of the above attributes of these Scandinavian countries are transferable to this country. Just as the failure of socialism to work in Greece. Our highly mixed population and our economic base are totally different. Also, understand how much those countries pay to achieve the level of socialism they have today. For example, in Sweden, the cost to pay for their programs is equal to more than half (51.9%) of that nation's total economic output; as measured by Gross Domestic Product. In this country, our government outlays are $3.5 trillion on an economy of $17.4 trillion; or, just 20% of our Gross Domestic Product. In order to achieve what Sweden has achieved, we would have to have massive increases in federal taxes. Even more, if we want the current $18+ trillion debt reduced or eliminated. Probably a third of all workers would work for the government.
Lastly, to pay for all this socialism, these countries tax everyone in the form of a Value Added Tax. A form of a 25% national sales tax (not applicable to food and some services that would impact tourism). That's because simply taxing the rich -- as Bernie Sanders would suggest -- won't even come close to paying for the large increase in socialism he is proposing.
References:
Clinton, Sanders spar over capitalism, gun control at Democratic presidential debate: http://www.amny.com/news/clinton-sanders-spar-over-capitalism-gun-control-at-democratic-presidential-debate-1.10959244
Economy and Business Environment: http://www.heritage.org/index/country/sweden
Is Sweden a False Utopia: http://www.newgeography.com/content/001543-is-sweden-a-false-utopia
Does Scandinavian Socialism Work?: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/101480/does-scandinavian-socialism-work-steven-plaut
Thursday, September 17, 2015
Why Bernie Sanders Is Doing So Well
Socialist politics in America has been around for more than a century, but socialists have rarely made any significant inroads into the workings of the U.S. government. To that point, Bernie Sanders is the only U.S. Senator who claims to be a true socialist; although the Socialist Party of America claims 69 members in the House of Representatives. Still, that's only about 16% of the current-serving 435 Representatives in this country, but one thing is true, we have never had a "declared" socialist President.
So, why is Bernie Sanders doing so well on the campaign trail?
Simply, socialists do well when the electorate senses that the current economic conditions are stacked against them. The Great Recession hurt a lot of Americans, and the policies of the Democrats and Barack Obama have done nothing to pull those Americans out of the hole that they were left in since the end of that recession.
This, then, was an open door for Bernie Sanders to walk through and garner large crowds with a lot of socialist rhetoric. He tells his crowds that the deck is stacked against them. He says it isn't fair that the ranks of millionaires and billionaires has been growing while their own incomes are in decline. He further tells them that big banks and big corporations such as Walmart, are getting rich off the backs of the poor; and, for that reason Wall Street is also evil. That no one should have college debt. College should be free. All of us should have Medicare. His list of his nanny state agendas goes on for ever.
Of course, this is music to the ears of those that envy the wealth they see, everyday on TV, and in the movies. What Bernie Sanders never tells you is how he's going to pay for all this. Other than tax the rich out of existence which, by itself, would never actually cover the cost of all of his socialist programs. Nor, does he explain how he would convert America to a nanny state with so little support for this in Congress.
Yet, people come out in hordes to hear him, and he is gaining ground against Hillary in the polls.
To every other politician in this country, Bernie's popularity should be a warning sign that this country is drifting towards socialism. A fact that has left many European countries, like Greece, in tatters. As a conservative, I believe that less government intervention and smaller government would better serve this country. The current glad-handing between lobbyists and politicians -- on both sides of the aisle -- is truly favoring the rich, big labor, and big business; playing right into the hands of the likes of Bernie Sanders.
Don't think it is just the Republicans who are playing favorites in our economy. Barack Obama -- just days before the $787 billion Stimulus Package was voted into law -- issued an executive order that told all of his departments to apply Project Labor Agreement rules to any federally funded project; wherever possible. Simply, what that did is funnel the vast majority of construction dollars to the 18% of construction workers and their companies that were unionized; leaving the almost all, small, independent, non-union construction companies out in the cold. It raised the cost of all projects so that there were fewer that could be done; and, as such, reduced the overall impact of the Stimulus Package.
References:
American Socialists Release Names of 70 Congressional Democrats in Their Ranks: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2010/08/american-socialists-release-names-of-70-congressional-democrats-in-their-caucus/
Bernie Sander On the Issues: https://berniesanders.com/issues/income-and-wealth-inequality/
Influence & Lobbying | OpenSecrets: https://www.opensecrets.org/influence/
Greek disaster is all about socialism - CNBC.com: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/01/greek-disaster-is-all-about-socialism.html
5 Ways Socialism Destroys Societies - John Hawkins: http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/02/25/5-ways-socialism-destroys-societies-n1800086/page/full
Executive Order 13502 -- Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-use-project-labor-agreements-federal-construction-projects
Project Labor Agreements: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Labor_Agreement
So, why is Bernie Sanders doing so well on the campaign trail?
Simply, socialists do well when the electorate senses that the current economic conditions are stacked against them. The Great Recession hurt a lot of Americans, and the policies of the Democrats and Barack Obama have done nothing to pull those Americans out of the hole that they were left in since the end of that recession.
This, then, was an open door for Bernie Sanders to walk through and garner large crowds with a lot of socialist rhetoric. He tells his crowds that the deck is stacked against them. He says it isn't fair that the ranks of millionaires and billionaires has been growing while their own incomes are in decline. He further tells them that big banks and big corporations such as Walmart, are getting rich off the backs of the poor; and, for that reason Wall Street is also evil. That no one should have college debt. College should be free. All of us should have Medicare. His list of his nanny state agendas goes on for ever.
Of course, this is music to the ears of those that envy the wealth they see, everyday on TV, and in the movies. What Bernie Sanders never tells you is how he's going to pay for all this. Other than tax the rich out of existence which, by itself, would never actually cover the cost of all of his socialist programs. Nor, does he explain how he would convert America to a nanny state with so little support for this in Congress.
Yet, people come out in hordes to hear him, and he is gaining ground against Hillary in the polls.
To every other politician in this country, Bernie's popularity should be a warning sign that this country is drifting towards socialism. A fact that has left many European countries, like Greece, in tatters. As a conservative, I believe that less government intervention and smaller government would better serve this country. The current glad-handing between lobbyists and politicians -- on both sides of the aisle -- is truly favoring the rich, big labor, and big business; playing right into the hands of the likes of Bernie Sanders.
Don't think it is just the Republicans who are playing favorites in our economy. Barack Obama -- just days before the $787 billion Stimulus Package was voted into law -- issued an executive order that told all of his departments to apply Project Labor Agreement rules to any federally funded project; wherever possible. Simply, what that did is funnel the vast majority of construction dollars to the 18% of construction workers and their companies that were unionized; leaving the almost all, small, independent, non-union construction companies out in the cold. It raised the cost of all projects so that there were fewer that could be done; and, as such, reduced the overall impact of the Stimulus Package.
References:
American Socialists Release Names of 70 Congressional Democrats in Their Ranks: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2010/08/american-socialists-release-names-of-70-congressional-democrats-in-their-caucus/
Bernie Sander On the Issues: https://berniesanders.com/issues/income-and-wealth-inequality/
Influence & Lobbying | OpenSecrets: https://www.opensecrets.org/influence/
Greek disaster is all about socialism - CNBC.com: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/01/greek-disaster-is-all-about-socialism.html
5 Ways Socialism Destroys Societies - John Hawkins: http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/02/25/5-ways-socialism-destroys-societies-n1800086/page/full
Executive Order 13502 -- Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-use-project-labor-agreements-federal-construction-projects
Project Labor Agreements: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Labor_Agreement
Labels:
appeal,
Bernie Sanders,
doing well,
rising,
socialism,
socialist
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
The Pope's Climate Change Encyclical: A Socialist Manifesto
Anyone reading Pope Francis' Encyclical ('Laudato Si') on climate change is left with three primary takeaways.
Now, defender's of the demands will say that he isn't demanding socialism as a means of wealth re-distribution. Instead, he is merely asking the world to care for the poor as part of Christ's teachings. Well, if that was true, why did he appoint one of the world's leading socialist and anti-capitalist authors, Naomi Klein, as the co-chairperson of his upcoming conference on climate change?
The trouble with the grand "revolution" is that it won't work. Socialism has never worked. Look at Greece today. They are about to collapse as a nation. All because of massive social programs being the norm in Greek society. That same European socialism is the reason why Portugal, Spain, Ireland, and Italy are all lined up to follow Greece down the road to ruin. Four of those five are Roman Catholic countries. Which brings me to the point that socialism and Catholicism seem to go hand in hand. Followed by social strife, poverty, and high unemployment.
Pope Francis is from Argentina which has many poor. A country which Naomi Klein filmed a socialist documentary 'about called The Take'. This is why the Pope has probably picked her and why he is a socialist. In fact, Mexico and Central and South America are all poor and, as such, many have turned to socialism to fix extreme income inequality. Again, all Catholic countries with the worst being Venezuela. Since Hugo Chavez strongly converted Venezuela to a near-communist form of socialism, the entire country suffers from shortages of basic necessities such as milk, meat, and even toilet paper. You see, once you destroy the wealth building mechanism of capitalism, the whole country descends into poverty. Too many takers and too few givers to keep it all going.
Simply, when all the capitalist's wealth is gone, what then? Who, then, can the poor turn to? Just remember the words of Margaret Thatcher: "The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."
References:
Pope Francis: 'Revolution' needed to combat climate change: http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/18/world/pope-francis-climate-technology-encyclical/
Pope's climate change encyclical tells rich nations: pay your debt to the poor: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/18/popes-climate-change-encyclical-calls-on-rich-nations-to-pay-social-debt
Pope Francis recruits Naomi Klein in climate change battle: Social activist ‘surprised but delighted’ to join top cardinal in high-level environment conference at the Vatican: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/28/pope-climate-change-naomi-klein
Naomi Klein: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Klein
The Take: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Take_%282004_film%29
Greeks chose poverty, let them have their way: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2bc11fe8-0dd5-11e5-9a65-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3f21oK8CI
The troubled PIIGS countries—Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain—have been suffering from financial sustainability concerns: http://marketrealist.com/2015/07/piigs-piis/
Rich In Oil, Venezuela Is Now Poor In Most Everything Else: http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/02/07/384331225/rich-in-oil-venezuela-is-now-poor-in-most-everything-else
Shortages In Venezuela: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortages_in_Venezuela
Socialism in Latin America: http://worldissues.weebly.com/socialism-in-latin-america.html
Margaret Thatcher On Socialism: http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/thatcher.asp
- Consumerism, driven by capitalism, is depleting the world's resources and raising the world's green house gasses resulting in global warming and climate change.
- Rich nations and rich people must transfer their wealth to poorer countries and poorer peoples to help compensate them for what he calls the "pile of filth" they have created in our common home of this earth.
- Population controls (abortion and contraception) are not the solution to fighting climate change.
Now, defender's of the demands will say that he isn't demanding socialism as a means of wealth re-distribution. Instead, he is merely asking the world to care for the poor as part of Christ's teachings. Well, if that was true, why did he appoint one of the world's leading socialist and anti-capitalist authors, Naomi Klein, as the co-chairperson of his upcoming conference on climate change?
The trouble with the grand "revolution" is that it won't work. Socialism has never worked. Look at Greece today. They are about to collapse as a nation. All because of massive social programs being the norm in Greek society. That same European socialism is the reason why Portugal, Spain, Ireland, and Italy are all lined up to follow Greece down the road to ruin. Four of those five are Roman Catholic countries. Which brings me to the point that socialism and Catholicism seem to go hand in hand. Followed by social strife, poverty, and high unemployment.
Pope Francis is from Argentina which has many poor. A country which Naomi Klein filmed a socialist documentary 'about called The Take'. This is why the Pope has probably picked her and why he is a socialist. In fact, Mexico and Central and South America are all poor and, as such, many have turned to socialism to fix extreme income inequality. Again, all Catholic countries with the worst being Venezuela. Since Hugo Chavez strongly converted Venezuela to a near-communist form of socialism, the entire country suffers from shortages of basic necessities such as milk, meat, and even toilet paper. You see, once you destroy the wealth building mechanism of capitalism, the whole country descends into poverty. Too many takers and too few givers to keep it all going.
Simply, when all the capitalist's wealth is gone, what then? Who, then, can the poor turn to? Just remember the words of Margaret Thatcher: "The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."
References:
Pope Francis: 'Revolution' needed to combat climate change: http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/18/world/pope-francis-climate-technology-encyclical/
Pope's climate change encyclical tells rich nations: pay your debt to the poor: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/18/popes-climate-change-encyclical-calls-on-rich-nations-to-pay-social-debt
Pope Francis recruits Naomi Klein in climate change battle: Social activist ‘surprised but delighted’ to join top cardinal in high-level environment conference at the Vatican: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/28/pope-climate-change-naomi-klein
Naomi Klein: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Klein
The Take: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Take_%282004_film%29
Greeks chose poverty, let them have their way: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2bc11fe8-0dd5-11e5-9a65-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3f21oK8CI
The troubled PIIGS countries—Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain—have been suffering from financial sustainability concerns: http://marketrealist.com/2015/07/piigs-piis/
Rich In Oil, Venezuela Is Now Poor In Most Everything Else: http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/02/07/384331225/rich-in-oil-venezuela-is-now-poor-in-most-everything-else
Shortages In Venezuela: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortages_in_Venezuela
Socialism in Latin America: http://worldissues.weebly.com/socialism-in-latin-america.html
Margaret Thatcher On Socialism: http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/thatcher.asp
Tuesday, June 2, 2015
Will Socialism Be The Only Answer In A World Run By Robots?
We already have cars being tested that drive themselves. So, when they are finally perfected and approved, why would we need cab drivers? What about bus drivers and truck drivers? In Nevada, German truck manufacturer Daimler is already testing a self-driving truck. Microsoft has replaced its human security guards patrolling it's Silicon Valley campus with 5 foot tall robots that use artificial intelligence to navigate and detect security problems. There's even a robot capable of sorting items at recycling centers.
The reality is, that an increasing number of jobs are being replaced by intelligent machines. So rapidly, in fact, that some experts believe that 30% of all jobs will be replaced by 2025.
The 30% of workers that do lose their jobs will no longer be paying into Social Security and Medicare to support the millions already living off of those two programs. They'll pay no taxes that typically support welfare and wards of the state. So, how is society going to take care of the millions of workers forced into unemployment by these machines? I think initially, the politicians will try to stop robot takeover through a tax on every one being deployed; arguing the taxes will be needed to pay for all those people who lost their jobs. Eventually, though, the only answer will be to allow robot takeover and dump capitalism in favor of socialism with everyone being paid by the state and allotted certain necessities for free. And, in the irony of all ironies, capitalism, the chief driver of innovation in the world, will die by its own hands.
References:
Self-driving Cars Are No Longer a Thing of the Future | TIME: http://time.com/3661446/self-driving-driverless-cars-ces/
The World’s First Self-Driving Semi-Truck Hits the Road: The World’s First Self-Driving Semi-Truck Hits the Road
Microsoft's Silicon Valley campus is protected by robots:http://www.dailydot.com/technology/microsoft-robot-security-guards/
Green machine: Intelligent robot system recycles waste: http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/07/tech/zenrobotics-recycling-robot/
The reality is, that an increasing number of jobs are being replaced by intelligent machines. So rapidly, in fact, that some experts believe that 30% of all jobs will be replaced by 2025.
The 30% of workers that do lose their jobs will no longer be paying into Social Security and Medicare to support the millions already living off of those two programs. They'll pay no taxes that typically support welfare and wards of the state. So, how is society going to take care of the millions of workers forced into unemployment by these machines? I think initially, the politicians will try to stop robot takeover through a tax on every one being deployed; arguing the taxes will be needed to pay for all those people who lost their jobs. Eventually, though, the only answer will be to allow robot takeover and dump capitalism in favor of socialism with everyone being paid by the state and allotted certain necessities for free. And, in the irony of all ironies, capitalism, the chief driver of innovation in the world, will die by its own hands.
References:
Self-driving Cars Are No Longer a Thing of the Future | TIME: http://time.com/3661446/self-driving-driverless-cars-ces/
The World’s First Self-Driving Semi-Truck Hits the Road: The World’s First Self-Driving Semi-Truck Hits the Road
Microsoft's Silicon Valley campus is protected by robots:http://www.dailydot.com/technology/microsoft-robot-security-guards/
Green machine: Intelligent robot system recycles waste: http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/07/tech/zenrobotics-recycling-robot/
Labels:
artificial intelligence,
automation,
capitalism,
jobs,
machines,
robots,
smart,
socialism,
welfare state
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
Obama's Attempts to Turn the U.S. Into a European-Style Welfare State
For decades, western European countries have increasingly become what are known as welfare states. By that, I mean that most of them use wealth redistribution (taxing the rich) in order to provide hefty and numerous social welfare programs such as universal free healthcare, social security, and welfare pay to those in poverty. Some countries even provide free tuition for higher education. Also, there are heavy mandates placed on businesses such as the promotion of collective bargaining and a guaranteed minimum wage.
Now, if all this sounds familiar, it is Barack Obama's philosophy in a nutshell. Mr. "free" for some but not all. What he wants is the Europeanisation of the United States. But, while the President is trying to spend this country in to more and more debt for social programs such as free community college, Europe is trying to extricate itself from the massive debt that these programs have caused. So, as a result, many European countries are reversing the existence of wide-spread social programs through something they refer to as "austerity".
Lots of social programs are fine until a recession hits. When the Great Recession in the U.S. spread to Europe, it sent its heaviest socialized countries reeling. Countries, who today, are still in trouble since the recession ended years ago. Probably, the best indicator of how troubled some of them are is their youth (15-24 years of age) unemployment rates. After all, they are supposed to be the future of any country. In Greece, the youth unemployment rate is an astounding 58.4%. Spain isn't far behind that at 57.3%. Then, there's Italy at 39.7%; Portugal 37.8%; Ireland 26.7%; and, France at 23.7%. Only Germany is doing well at 7.8%. In the U.S., youth unemployment is still historically high at 15.8%; though nothing like most of our socialized friends in Europe.
Poverty, too, is high throughout the European Union (EU) and its member states. While the poverty rate in this country is about 14.5%, the EU has a collective rate of 16.4%. And, poverty is on the rise as austerity programs kick in. Simply, too many Europeans were on the government dole through social programs. Remove or reduce those programs and more and more people fall into poverty. Thus, there is a rising backlash against the continuation of austerity programs; resulting in the potential of more European countries become leftist. A fact that will only deepen debt and dependence on the government. Except for the rich. Of course!
Basically, Europe is telling us what "not" to do and, Obama and his Democrats aren't listening. Taxing the rich and giving people a lot of free stuff is putting us at the kind of risk that Europe, now, finds itself in. In 2014, our top 1% will paid 37% of all taxes; while only earning 19% of this nations wages/incomes. The top 10% pay 71% of all the taxes.
When recessions hit, rich people also take a hit on their incomes from their investments or companies they may own. They, also, can lose their jobs as companies go under. As a result, taxes fall and debt increases. That is what happened in Europe and that is what the President is setting this country up for in the future by making us too dependent on too few rich incomes. In light of all this, there is an old saying that definitely bears repeating: "Social programs are a lot like a big red [communist/socialist] wagon. At some point, you get to a place where there's too many people riding in that wagon and not enough people left behind to pull it."
References:
European social model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_social_model
Welfare State: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_state
The European Welfare State and Its Lessons for America: http://www.cato.org/policy-report/julyaugust-2013/european-welfare-state-its-lessons-america
Youth Unemployment by Country: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.1524.ZS
Discussion: Why do Europeans come to the US when college is free over there: http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/international-students/1129831-why-do-europeans-come-to-the-us-when-college-is-free-over-their.html
Up to 25 million more Europeans at risk of poverty by 2025 if austerity drags on: http://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2013-09-12/25-million-more-europeans-risk-poverty-2025-if-austerity-drags
Europeanisation - Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europeanisation
Enough With European Austerity, Bring on the Stimulus: https://www.google.com/search?q=Enough+With+European+Austerity%2C+Bring+on+the+Stimulus&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
A radical left-wing party that is demanding an end to Greece's painful austerity measures won Sunday's parliamentary elections: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_GREECE_ELECTION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-01-25-12-09-15
Poverty in Europe: the Current Situation: http://www.inequalitywatch.eu/spip.php?article99
2014 Tax Day Chart: Who Pays the Most?: http://dailysignal.com/2014/04/15/2014-tax-day-chart-pays/
The Rich Are No Longer Recession-Proof - Newsweek: http://www.newsweek.com/rich-are-no-longer-recession-proof-81901
Now, if all this sounds familiar, it is Barack Obama's philosophy in a nutshell. Mr. "free" for some but not all. What he wants is the Europeanisation of the United States. But, while the President is trying to spend this country in to more and more debt for social programs such as free community college, Europe is trying to extricate itself from the massive debt that these programs have caused. So, as a result, many European countries are reversing the existence of wide-spread social programs through something they refer to as "austerity".
Lots of social programs are fine until a recession hits. When the Great Recession in the U.S. spread to Europe, it sent its heaviest socialized countries reeling. Countries, who today, are still in trouble since the recession ended years ago. Probably, the best indicator of how troubled some of them are is their youth (15-24 years of age) unemployment rates. After all, they are supposed to be the future of any country. In Greece, the youth unemployment rate is an astounding 58.4%. Spain isn't far behind that at 57.3%. Then, there's Italy at 39.7%; Portugal 37.8%; Ireland 26.7%; and, France at 23.7%. Only Germany is doing well at 7.8%. In the U.S., youth unemployment is still historically high at 15.8%; though nothing like most of our socialized friends in Europe.
Poverty, too, is high throughout the European Union (EU) and its member states. While the poverty rate in this country is about 14.5%, the EU has a collective rate of 16.4%. And, poverty is on the rise as austerity programs kick in. Simply, too many Europeans were on the government dole through social programs. Remove or reduce those programs and more and more people fall into poverty. Thus, there is a rising backlash against the continuation of austerity programs; resulting in the potential of more European countries become leftist. A fact that will only deepen debt and dependence on the government. Except for the rich. Of course!
Basically, Europe is telling us what "not" to do and, Obama and his Democrats aren't listening. Taxing the rich and giving people a lot of free stuff is putting us at the kind of risk that Europe, now, finds itself in. In 2014, our top 1% will paid 37% of all taxes; while only earning 19% of this nations wages/incomes. The top 10% pay 71% of all the taxes.
When recessions hit, rich people also take a hit on their incomes from their investments or companies they may own. They, also, can lose their jobs as companies go under. As a result, taxes fall and debt increases. That is what happened in Europe and that is what the President is setting this country up for in the future by making us too dependent on too few rich incomes. In light of all this, there is an old saying that definitely bears repeating: "Social programs are a lot like a big red [communist/socialist] wagon. At some point, you get to a place where there's too many people riding in that wagon and not enough people left behind to pull it."
References:
European social model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_social_model
Welfare State: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_state
The European Welfare State and Its Lessons for America: http://www.cato.org/policy-report/julyaugust-2013/european-welfare-state-its-lessons-america
Youth Unemployment by Country: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.1524.ZS
Discussion: Why do Europeans come to the US when college is free over there: http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/international-students/1129831-why-do-europeans-come-to-the-us-when-college-is-free-over-their.html
Up to 25 million more Europeans at risk of poverty by 2025 if austerity drags on: http://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2013-09-12/25-million-more-europeans-risk-poverty-2025-if-austerity-drags
Europeanisation - Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europeanisation
Enough With European Austerity, Bring on the Stimulus: https://www.google.com/search?q=Enough+With+European+Austerity%2C+Bring+on+the+Stimulus&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
A radical left-wing party that is demanding an end to Greece's painful austerity measures won Sunday's parliamentary elections: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_GREECE_ELECTION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-01-25-12-09-15
Poverty in Europe: the Current Situation: http://www.inequalitywatch.eu/spip.php?article99
2014 Tax Day Chart: Who Pays the Most?: http://dailysignal.com/2014/04/15/2014-tax-day-chart-pays/
The Rich Are No Longer Recession-Proof - Newsweek: http://www.newsweek.com/rich-are-no-longer-recession-proof-81901
Friday, December 26, 2014
What's Really Behind The December 23rd Protests In New York City
The graphic you see above was posted on a website of the organizers of the December 23rd protest march down New York City's 5th Avenue. The organizers in this case were a group of individuals that call themselves the A.N.S.W.E.R Coalition. The acronym A.N.S.W.E.R stands for Act Now to Stop War and End Racism.
Now, while ending wars and stopping racism sounds like truly noble endeavors, the real reason this group exists is to try and divide Americans over issues such as race and war; and, in doing so, attempt to destroy the country as we know it. The people who founded this group did so right after 9/11 and before we had even talked of invading Afghanistan. Their motives were less about us going to war over 9/11 and more about the fact that we deserved what we got; and, as such, the people responsible for the horror of that day should not be punished with war. The "coalition" they represent is pretty much pro-socialism and anti-capitalism; pro-Palestinian/Muslim/Arab and anti-Israel; and, they all support the destruction of this capitalist society. That is exactly why they chose 5th Avenue to march in protest. 5th Avenue is arguably the most pricey and prestigious street in the United States with some of the most expensive store fronts and shops in the world. It symbolizes everything these people think is wrong with our country. Specifically, wealth and capitalism.
So, whether or not the people marching in that protest knew it or not, they were participating in an event that was designed to fracture and weaken this country. An attempt to pit Americans against the police. To divide blacks against whites and the police. And, for those who participated in that protest not knowing what A.N.S.W.E.R is all about, there's one name for them: Useful Idiots.
One last thing. For those who think capitalism is bad and socialism good, ask yourself why there are only 4 remaining socialist countries in the world: Vietnam, Laos, North Korean, and Cuba. Even China, which at one time was a hardcore communist nation, has evolved into a more and more capitalistic society by the day. Gone are all the former union of Soviet satellites that were once socialist/communist because the way of socialism is oppressive and it literally breaks the human spirit of free will.
References:
ANSWER Coalition: Tuesday, Dec. 23 March Proceeding As planned: http://www.answercoalition.org/
A.N.S.W.E.R.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.N.S.W.E.R.
A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism): Profile By Stand4Fact.org: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/answerprofilestand.html
Fifth Avenue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Avenue
Useful idiot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
List of socialist states: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states
Now, while ending wars and stopping racism sounds like truly noble endeavors, the real reason this group exists is to try and divide Americans over issues such as race and war; and, in doing so, attempt to destroy the country as we know it. The people who founded this group did so right after 9/11 and before we had even talked of invading Afghanistan. Their motives were less about us going to war over 9/11 and more about the fact that we deserved what we got; and, as such, the people responsible for the horror of that day should not be punished with war. The "coalition" they represent is pretty much pro-socialism and anti-capitalism; pro-Palestinian/Muslim/Arab and anti-Israel; and, they all support the destruction of this capitalist society. That is exactly why they chose 5th Avenue to march in protest. 5th Avenue is arguably the most pricey and prestigious street in the United States with some of the most expensive store fronts and shops in the world. It symbolizes everything these people think is wrong with our country. Specifically, wealth and capitalism.
So, whether or not the people marching in that protest knew it or not, they were participating in an event that was designed to fracture and weaken this country. An attempt to pit Americans against the police. To divide blacks against whites and the police. And, for those who participated in that protest not knowing what A.N.S.W.E.R is all about, there's one name for them: Useful Idiots.
One last thing. For those who think capitalism is bad and socialism good, ask yourself why there are only 4 remaining socialist countries in the world: Vietnam, Laos, North Korean, and Cuba. Even China, which at one time was a hardcore communist nation, has evolved into a more and more capitalistic society by the day. Gone are all the former union of Soviet satellites that were once socialist/communist because the way of socialism is oppressive and it literally breaks the human spirit of free will.
References:
ANSWER Coalition: Tuesday, Dec. 23 March Proceeding As planned: http://www.answercoalition.org/
A.N.S.W.E.R.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.N.S.W.E.R.
A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism): Profile By Stand4Fact.org: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/answerprofilestand.html
Fifth Avenue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Avenue
Useful idiot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
List of socialist states: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states
Labels:
5th Avenue,
9/11,
ANSWER Coalition,
anti-capitalism,
communism,
pro-Palestinian,
protests,
racism,
socialism,
useful idiots,
War
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
The Current Rise In Liberalism Is Actually Being Fueled By The Detrimental Effects of Liberalism
When times are bad, the masses turn to the government for help; and, as long as that government provides that help, it will survive and continue to grow.
This is what's happening in America today. It doesn't matter if 23 million people are either unemployed or underemployed, the general masses are being satisfied by expanding government programs under Obama's reign; such as increases in medicaid, welfare, food stamps, and with new social programs like ObamaCare. But, what's interesting is that our current expansion of liberalism in this country is a direct result of it's detrimental effects on our economy. As our economy further weakens, the trend will only move towards more government dependency. This is why the voters rejected Romney's fix for American Capitalism. We are literally seeing the destruction of capitalism and the movement towards socialism; right before our eyes. Obama is, as promised, fundamentally changing America. We are becoming the likes of Greece and Spain with a similar fate to theirs; just years away.
This is what's happening in America today. It doesn't matter if 23 million people are either unemployed or underemployed, the general masses are being satisfied by expanding government programs under Obama's reign; such as increases in medicaid, welfare, food stamps, and with new social programs like ObamaCare. But, what's interesting is that our current expansion of liberalism in this country is a direct result of it's detrimental effects on our economy. As our economy further weakens, the trend will only move towards more government dependency. This is why the voters rejected Romney's fix for American Capitalism. We are literally seeing the destruction of capitalism and the movement towards socialism; right before our eyes. Obama is, as promised, fundamentally changing America. We are becoming the likes of Greece and Spain with a similar fate to theirs; just years away.
Labels:
capitalism,
economy,
food stamps,
liberalism,
socialism,
Welfare
Monday, May 7, 2012
A Socialist President? What Are The French Thinking?
Well, if you don't know by now, Nicolas Sarkozy lost the top job in French politics. In his place will be an avowed socialist: François Hollande. Now, if this newly minted socialist President gets his way, my guess is that it won't be long before France wishes they had Sarkozy back, because every economic plan that Hollande has for France is an economy killer.
For one, Hollande plans not to just raise the taxes on the rich, but, instead, he's clearly stated that he wants to "soak the rich". If you make a million euros or more a year, he plans a 75% tax. For those making 150,000 euros or more, the tax will be 45%. Executive pay will be mandatorily limited to 20 times that of the pay of the average worker. He will increase the Value Added Tax (VAT) on everything people buy to help pay for his new social programs. He also plans to arbitrarily hire 60,000 additional teachers. And, the retirement age with full pension benefits will be lowered from 62 to 60 years of age for those working at least 41 years.
Sarkozy lost because the French economy was floundering. But, there is nothing in the Hollande plan for that will make the French economy any better. Just more taxes and more spending. Socialism doesn't work. It hasn't worked in Venezuela and it won't work in France. All that will happen is that the wealthy and some businesses will leave the country. With earlier retirements, pension expenses will eat the country alive. With higher VAT's, consumer spending will be slowed and the economy along with it. France is already in recession. Hollande will only exacerbate that harsh economic reality.
For one, Hollande plans not to just raise the taxes on the rich, but, instead, he's clearly stated that he wants to "soak the rich". If you make a million euros or more a year, he plans a 75% tax. For those making 150,000 euros or more, the tax will be 45%. Executive pay will be mandatorily limited to 20 times that of the pay of the average worker. He will increase the Value Added Tax (VAT) on everything people buy to help pay for his new social programs. He also plans to arbitrarily hire 60,000 additional teachers. And, the retirement age with full pension benefits will be lowered from 62 to 60 years of age for those working at least 41 years.
Sarkozy lost because the French economy was floundering. But, there is nothing in the Hollande plan for that will make the French economy any better. Just more taxes and more spending. Socialism doesn't work. It hasn't worked in Venezuela and it won't work in France. All that will happen is that the wealthy and some businesses will leave the country. With earlier retirements, pension expenses will eat the country alive. With higher VAT's, consumer spending will be slowed and the economy along with it. France is already in recession. Hollande will only exacerbate that harsh economic reality.
Monday, December 5, 2011
Income Disparity: Social Injustice or Socialist Jealously?
On a recent MSNBC "Morning Joe" program, former President Carter's National Security Adviser, Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, claimed that the United States is one of the most socially unjust nations in the world (Click here to See the Story and The Video). To prove this, he pointed to our ranking in something called the GINI coefficient where we were clustered at the top of the most "unjust" country's list along with countries like Brazil, Mexico, India, and China. Simply speaking, the "Gini" is a measurement of the disparity between the rich and the poor in any given country. It was developed by a socialist, for socialist propaganda, and the results are generally skewed to make socialism look better than capitalism because it favors countries that have little or no individual exceptionalism and countries where the government dictates salaries. Lastly, Brzezinski claimed that Europeans are more upwardly mobile than Americans.
There's a reason that Jimmy Carter wears the "worst President ever" crown. He basically hired idiot socialists like Brzezinski.
Once again, we have a another leftist -- in concert with Obama -- playing class warfare. People like Brzezinski seem to think that income disparity is the only measurement of a society that counts. But, what they ignore is that fact that Americans enjoy one of the highest standards of living; including our supposed 30 million poor. Many of the so-called poor of this country enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle than the poor of hundreds of other countries. According to a study conducted by our own Department of Energy on energy consumption by social class, 99.7% of those defined as poor have refrigerators and 95% have stoves and ovens. Nearly 98% have TV's. Most have cars and nearly 75% have home air conditioning. In Europe, even some of the most posh apartments don't have air conditioning because energy prices are too high. That's why over 5000 people died in 2003 in France when they had several days of 100 degree heat.
I'm not saying that people aren't hurting in America but, we have several safety nets to help those people survive who have little or no income. 1.2 million of our poor live in some form of low rent or rent-free public housing. 40 million receive food stamps. 57 million Americans receive health care support through Medicaid. We have free school lunch programs in support of the poor. Additionally, people, having low incomes can actually file an income tax return, pay no taxes, and get paid in the process through something called the Earned Income Tax Credit. And, list goes on.
When it comes to income disparity, the only thing that comes to my mind is social jealousy and not the lack of social justice. Does it really matter if Jay Leno has a warehouse full of expensive rare cars? Does his having those cars prevent anyone else from having a car? Not hardly. What really matters is that almost all Americans who "need" a car have one.
It also amazes me that Brzezinski used Europe as an example of a more upwardly mobile society to live in than the U.S. Aside from Germany, Europe is in a mess and either partly or wholly teetering on collapse. The social unrest is unbelievable. Brzezinski is just totally off his nut. Again, it all comes down to standards of living and the purchasing power of Americans versus Europeans. The average new home being built in the U.K., for example, is just under 800 square feet; the worst in Europe (Click here to See Story). In the U.S., that number is over 2300 square feet. Even in the more affluent country of Denmark, the average new home size is still nearly half that of the U.S. The average American household owns 2.3 automobiles. In Europe, the statistic is half that and Europeans depend heavily on public transportation. But, there's a reason for this and it all has to do with the fact that Europeans have less disposable income than Americans. That's why the average age of an automobile in Europe is 13 years compared to only 9 years in the U.S.
Over and over again, liberals love to hate America. If Brzezinski thinks Europe is such a great place, then move there and take his daughter, Mika (Joe Scarborough's Co-Host on "Morning Joe"), with him. If the "Gini" is so important, he should think about moving to a country like Botswana, where there is such "low" disparity of income. A place, where so many people get to enjoy all the amenities of a one or two-room, dirt-floor house or hut that has no running water, no electricity and, certainly, no air conditioning. Yes sir, that "Gini" is fine way of measuring social justice.
There's a reason that Jimmy Carter wears the "worst President ever" crown. He basically hired idiot socialists like Brzezinski.
Once again, we have a another leftist -- in concert with Obama -- playing class warfare. People like Brzezinski seem to think that income disparity is the only measurement of a society that counts. But, what they ignore is that fact that Americans enjoy one of the highest standards of living; including our supposed 30 million poor. Many of the so-called poor of this country enjoy a more comfortable lifestyle than the poor of hundreds of other countries. According to a study conducted by our own Department of Energy on energy consumption by social class, 99.7% of those defined as poor have refrigerators and 95% have stoves and ovens. Nearly 98% have TV's. Most have cars and nearly 75% have home air conditioning. In Europe, even some of the most posh apartments don't have air conditioning because energy prices are too high. That's why over 5000 people died in 2003 in France when they had several days of 100 degree heat.
I'm not saying that people aren't hurting in America but, we have several safety nets to help those people survive who have little or no income. 1.2 million of our poor live in some form of low rent or rent-free public housing. 40 million receive food stamps. 57 million Americans receive health care support through Medicaid. We have free school lunch programs in support of the poor. Additionally, people, having low incomes can actually file an income tax return, pay no taxes, and get paid in the process through something called the Earned Income Tax Credit. And, list goes on.
When it comes to income disparity, the only thing that comes to my mind is social jealousy and not the lack of social justice. Does it really matter if Jay Leno has a warehouse full of expensive rare cars? Does his having those cars prevent anyone else from having a car? Not hardly. What really matters is that almost all Americans who "need" a car have one.
It also amazes me that Brzezinski used Europe as an example of a more upwardly mobile society to live in than the U.S. Aside from Germany, Europe is in a mess and either partly or wholly teetering on collapse. The social unrest is unbelievable. Brzezinski is just totally off his nut. Again, it all comes down to standards of living and the purchasing power of Americans versus Europeans. The average new home being built in the U.K., for example, is just under 800 square feet; the worst in Europe (Click here to See Story). In the U.S., that number is over 2300 square feet. Even in the more affluent country of Denmark, the average new home size is still nearly half that of the U.S. The average American household owns 2.3 automobiles. In Europe, the statistic is half that and Europeans depend heavily on public transportation. But, there's a reason for this and it all has to do with the fact that Europeans have less disposable income than Americans. That's why the average age of an automobile in Europe is 13 years compared to only 9 years in the U.S.
Over and over again, liberals love to hate America. If Brzezinski thinks Europe is such a great place, then move there and take his daughter, Mika (Joe Scarborough's Co-Host on "Morning Joe"), with him. If the "Gini" is so important, he should think about moving to a country like Botswana, where there is such "low" disparity of income. A place, where so many people get to enjoy all the amenities of a one or two-room, dirt-floor house or hut that has no running water, no electricity and, certainly, no air conditioning. Yes sir, that "Gini" is fine way of measuring social justice.
Monday, August 2, 2010
Socialism Spawns Socialism
We know from past experience, that the welfare system in America has actually locked generations into a losing system for the rest of their lives. Originally intended as a so-called "safety net" to help people get back on their feet during hard times, it, instead, became a way of life with children of welfare recipients becoming future captives of the same system they grew up in.
Socialism is often referred to as "creeping socialism" because it, like some kind of cancer, spreads until, someday, the state government literally runs everything. Socialism is like a narcotic that pulls more and more citizens into its grasp; and, eventually the nanny-state fully evolves.
I often hear people say that the United States is not Europe when it comes to socialism. But, it wasn't very long ago when Europe wasn't what it is today, with all its socialist burdens.
I'm of the belief that socialism spawns socialism by weakening a capitalistic society. With every social program created, workers and money makers have to ante up more and more of their own money in order to subsidize an increasingly larger group of state-dependent citizens. As the state keeps taking more from the successful segment of society, those money makers find themselves being driven out of business and, thus, forced to join the increasingly larger group of state-dependents. Eventually -- too many have jumped into the wagon, with no one left to pull it.
Usually, unemployment insurance is the first step in the creation of a socialist state. It follows the logic that you can't have the unemployed starving and dying in the streets while they're looking for a new job. Then, the socialist will push for a government-run retirement program like our "Social" Security system. Next there's the institution of a welfare system for those who are determined, by the state, to be unemployable. Often, this includes food stamps, housing, and some kind of state-provided salary. Then, there has to be a government-run health care system so that, again, you don't have people dying for lack of care. Oh, and let's not forget that, eventually, higher education should be the right of every citizen as well.
With each of these programs, more and more citizens are being cared for by the government and more and more government funds and people (working for the government) are needed to support the programs. As this occurs, the burden of taxes rises and shaky businesses are forced to go under with the owners and the employees of those fallen businesses being forced to join the increasingly larger group of government-shepherded citizens. Then, ultimately, you have a society like Greece where the state can no longer support itself. Make no mistake, Obama and the Democrats have put us ever closer to the day when that fate will be our own.
Socialism is often referred to as "creeping socialism" because it, like some kind of cancer, spreads until, someday, the state government literally runs everything. Socialism is like a narcotic that pulls more and more citizens into its grasp; and, eventually the nanny-state fully evolves.
I often hear people say that the United States is not Europe when it comes to socialism. But, it wasn't very long ago when Europe wasn't what it is today, with all its socialist burdens.
I'm of the belief that socialism spawns socialism by weakening a capitalistic society. With every social program created, workers and money makers have to ante up more and more of their own money in order to subsidize an increasingly larger group of state-dependent citizens. As the state keeps taking more from the successful segment of society, those money makers find themselves being driven out of business and, thus, forced to join the increasingly larger group of state-dependents. Eventually -- too many have jumped into the wagon, with no one left to pull it.
Usually, unemployment insurance is the first step in the creation of a socialist state. It follows the logic that you can't have the unemployed starving and dying in the streets while they're looking for a new job. Then, the socialist will push for a government-run retirement program like our "Social" Security system. Next there's the institution of a welfare system for those who are determined, by the state, to be unemployable. Often, this includes food stamps, housing, and some kind of state-provided salary. Then, there has to be a government-run health care system so that, again, you don't have people dying for lack of care. Oh, and let's not forget that, eventually, higher education should be the right of every citizen as well.
With each of these programs, more and more citizens are being cared for by the government and more and more government funds and people (working for the government) are needed to support the programs. As this occurs, the burden of taxes rises and shaky businesses are forced to go under with the owners and the employees of those fallen businesses being forced to join the increasingly larger group of government-shepherded citizens. Then, ultimately, you have a society like Greece where the state can no longer support itself. Make no mistake, Obama and the Democrats have put us ever closer to the day when that fate will be our own.
Labels:
capitalism,
Medicare,
social security,
socialism,
unemployment insurance,
Welfare
Monday, March 1, 2010
Is Obama A Socialist?
There seems to be a raging conflict in this country among the political partisans of our media as to whether or not Barack Obama is a socialist. In fact, just last Monday, that was the debate on the O'Reilly Factor with Juan Williams (on the political left) and Mary Katharine Ham (on the right). The people on the left, like Juan Williams , are adamant in defending Obama as "not" being a socialist.
But, what they are all missing is what a socialist -- one who believes in socialism -- isn't. By definition, socialism is the complete opposite of selfism, individualism, and capitalism. Therefore, if Obama is not a socialist, please explain to me what policies he has initiated in opposition of socialism.
Just think about what he has done or promoted since he came to office.
Ask yourself the following questions:
But, what they are all missing is what a socialist -- one who believes in socialism -- isn't. By definition, socialism is the complete opposite of selfism, individualism, and capitalism. Therefore, if Obama is not a socialist, please explain to me what policies he has initiated in opposition of socialism.
Just think about what he has done or promoted since he came to office.
Ask yourself the following questions:
Is the government takeover and the ultimate handing over of the control of General Motors to the labor unions (instead of the creditors -- as would be the case in a normal capitalist society) a non-socialist act? Is the nationalization of health care in America a non-socialist act? Is forcing individual citizens to buy health insurance or face fines and imprisonment a non-socialist act and one that promotes individualism and/or selfism? Is telling banks and lending institutions how much they can pay the executives an act of capitalism and one that promotes the principals of capitalism: individualism and selfism? Is price fixing the rate that college students pay for student loans and forgiving those loans if they work for the "state" a non-socialist act? Is the potential of passing a law that takes away the Secret Ballot for unionization of companies a non-socialist, capitalistic act? Is that even American? Is spending Federal tax money to force the installation of "green technologies" rather than letting the free market system decide if those technologies are appropriate and cost effective a non-socialist act? Is constantly meeting with the leader of the SEIU and taking this country in the direction that would primarily support labor unions non-socialist or capitalist behavior?Obama has no love for business -- the very engine that has done more to make this country what it is. The bottom line is that Obama is anti-business and a big government "socialist". That's what he is and to defend him as being something other than that is just blind stupidity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

