Nancy Pelosi has already said as much:
"A special prosecutor is the first step, but it cannot be the last. Director Mueller will still be in the chain of command under the Trump-appointed leadership of the Justice Department. He cannot take the place of a truly independent, outside commission that is completely free from the Trump administration’s meddling."After the Mueller appointment, Representative Maxine Waters stated this:
"No actual evidence yet, but connecting the dots will lead to Trump impeachment."There are no dots to connect; but, by making the statement, any listener is lead to believe it is simply a forgone conclusion. In the case of an impeachment, "high crimes and misdemeanors" must be proven in a straight line, in a fully connected fashion. Not merely based on an assumption from a bunch of fictional dots.
Lastly, Nancy Pelosi continues to call Mueller a Special Prosecutor and not his actual title of Special Counsel. The reason of course, is obvious. "Prosecutor" implies guilt, and the only thing left to do is to prosecute. If you doubt this, just look at the poster being displayed at a news conference showing "President" Trump happily shaking the hand of the Foreign Minister:
If that isn't political theater then nothing is. Of course there are plenty of similar pictures of Hillary Clinton doing the same thing. I especially like this one of eager President Obama being quicker on the handshake draw in his meeting with Putin:
Enough Said!
References:
Dems Laud Special Counsel, But Say It's Not Enough: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/05/18/dems_laud_special_counsel_but_say_its_not_enough.html
Maxine Waters: No Actual Evidence Yet, But Connecting The Dots Will Lead To Trump Impeachment: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/18/maxine_waters_no_actual_evidence_yet_but_connecting_the_dots_will_lead_to_trump_impeachment.html
Source of the Obama Photo: http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/D2mrMsiiK8f/President+Obama+Holds+Talks+Moscow/UcMh37HL9e7
1 comment:
Enter gerber photo contest 2020 from which you could win $25000 cash prize.
Post a Comment