In a nutshell, she focuses in on the fact that salaries for the top 20% of American wage earners have risen more rapidly than those at the bottom. In fact, when adjusted for inflation, she shows that incomes at the bottom have fallen by 62%. I would certainly agree with that conclusion on a simply statistical basis. After all, the people who make up the category of "rich" in this country have seen their incomes explode over the last two generations. Professional athletes, with all their endorsements and high salaries, are more likely to be instant millionaires today than a generation ago. The same is true for all those in the entertainment industry. At the same time, much-sought-out Wall Streeters, CEO's, and select MBA's and PHD's have seen there salaries rise more rapidly than even 10 years ago.
But, the problem with Ms. Rampell's conclusion of a "Poorer Poor" is that it simply ignores the reality that the poor and lower middle class of today are a lot better off then their predecessors Which is one of the key conclusions on page 5 of the Pew report:
"Eighty-four percent of Americans have higher family incomes than their parents had at the same age, and across all levels of the income distribution, this generation is doing better than the one that came before it."Ms. Rampell also seems to forget that, in 1968, people making as little as $900 paid a federal income tax. Today, almost half of all Americans pay no federal income tax. In fact, those at the bottom, actually get rebate checks if they file a tax return. Further, social programs, like LBJ's Great Society, have greatly improved the lives of the poor in last 4 decades. They are now guaranteed free healthcare through programs like Medicaid. Most receive welfare checks. Children get free or low-cost school lunches under the National School Lunch Act. There is a similar program for breakfasts. Today, many of our poor have amenities that the poor of 1968 could only dream of; like TV's, cars, and cell phones.
But, more importantly, Ms. Rampell ignores another key conclusion of that report (again on page 5):
"Forty-three percent of Americans raised in the bottom quintile remain stuck in the bottom as adults..."Now, when you look at that above statement on a more positive basis, it says that 57% of those born into poverty actually are able to lift themselves out of poverty. Certainly, for those who accomplished this, you can't argue that those people got poorer.
Additionally, the Pew report also concluded that only 40% of those born into wealth remain wealthy. Conversely, this means that 60% of rich at birth wind up being poorer. Meaning that Ms. Rampell's conclusion of a "Richer Rich" is, in reality, just all wet.
To me, this report just proves that the American Dream is alive and well for those who "seek" it out. And, the key to this is education. As Pew reported:
"Having a college degree makes a person more than three times more likely to rise from the bottom of the family income ladder all the way to the top, and makes a person more than four times more likely to rise from the bottom of the family wealth ladder to the top."References:
--- New York Times Article: Richer Rich, and Poorer Poor: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/10/richer-rich-and-poorer-poor/
--- Pew Report: Pursuing the American Dream: Economic Mobility Across Generations: http://www.pewstates.org/uploadedFiles/PCS_Assets/2012/Pursuing_American_Dream.pdf
--- 1968 Tax Instructions: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i1040a--1968.pdf
--- Heritage Foundation: Understanding Poverty in the United States: Surprising Facts About America's Poor: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/09/understanding-poverty-in-the-united-states-surprising-facts-about-americas-poor